Hello Dmitry, Thanks for the work. Probably could standardize it in python3 for the tooling that uses it. It will have to be tested.
Just a thought, to give consideration to widen the scope beyond policy to have one or more blessed base images for ONAP ones based on Alpine, so other projects can benefit and avoid issues such as the POLICY-1604 one. Jorge From: Puzikov Dmitry [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 8:12 AM To: DRAGOSH, PAM <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Adolfo Perez-Duran <[email protected]> Cc: Klozik Martin <[email protected]>; HERNANDEZ-HERRERO, JORGE <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [policy] [cia] Hello, Pam, Jorge, Thank you for help, I've put base and common into the policy/docker repo. Jorge, what do you think regarding python packages? Thank you, Regards, Dmitry ________________________________ From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:56 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Puzikov Dmitry; Adolfo Perez-Duran Cc: Klozik Martin; HERNANDEZ-HERRERO, JORGE Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [policy] [cia] Dmitry, We have a policy/docker repo that was used previously for our docker images. We moved away from it to better support each component. Right now it still exists to support heat installation. Perhaps that repo could be used? We don't really have python applications in our code base. Jorge knows best or can help determine where the requirement for python is. Perhaps it would be good to clean that up. Thanks, Pam From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Dmitry Puzikov <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 6:50 AM To: "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Adolfo Perez-Duran <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Klozik Martin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "HERNANDEZ-HERRERO, JORGE" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected] Group<mailto:[email protected]%20Group>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [onap-discuss] [policy] [cia] Hello, Pam, I'm starting to push drafts for policy images rebased on separated base and common images. I'm still not sure what sub-project is best to land base and common images. If you have any thoughts regarding it or anything that caught your eye, please, let me know. Also I have some concerns regarding packages installed. I left packages installed as they were, but are they all required to run apps? What python version is required? Currently both python2 and python3 (and related tools) are installing so it can add some unnecessary overhead. As I proposed earlier if Policy team accepts drafts first we need to set up Jenkins job to build base/common images and push them to onap registry and only after that we can continue with merging rebased app images. Thank you, Best Regards, Dmitry -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#16369): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/16369 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/30792592/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
