Hi Jimmy, While reducing the depth does help, as long as the relationship list keeps increasing, this slowdown will continue (albeit at a reduced pace).
Do you know if there are any numbers as to the expected performance of ONAP during VNF instantiation with a large number of instances (several thousand) attached to a single service model? Since this problem occurs in the Dublin release, I am wondering if there have been any relevant performance improvements in subsequent releases. Alternatively, if the relationship list is not needed, is there a way to exclude it completely from the response? Thanks again for your help, Adam -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20251): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/20251 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/71899296/21656 Mute #aai: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=aai&subid=2740164 Mute #dublin: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=dublin&subid=2740164 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
