Hi Vijay, from the BBS team side, RCC and VES mapper are not strictly necessary. They are only needed if the vendor equipment requires RESTCONF. At the moment, we cannot guarantee resources to implement the maintenance tasks required in Guilin, so it’s fine for us to deprecate them. In case we get additional support before Guilin/M1, I will let you know.
Regards, David On 30 Jun 2020, at 19:05, Vijay VK <vv7...@att.com<mailto:vv7...@att.com>> wrote: CCPVN/BBS Usecase team, The following MS were introduced in DCAE during R3/R4 release in support of your usecase. * VES Adapter/Mapper (original contribution from TechM) * RESTConf collector (original contribution from Huawei) However for both El-Alto and Frankfurt releases, there has been no active development/support offered. In-addition to backlog, these components are due for security updates (vulnerabilities fixes, java11 upgrade etc.) that are mandated by TSC for Guilin. Please confirm if you are still requiring these microservices to be continued, if so I do expect usecase teams to provide resources for support (if any question on work entailed/jira’s – pls reach out to me). In the absence of volunteer or confirmation of these services being required – there is risk of deprecating this components for Guilin. Would appreciate your response soon as Guilin/M1 is due next week. Regards, Vijay (DCAE PTL) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21573): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/21573 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/75234864/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
