Hi Brian

We tried to attach floating IP to the public interface created by vFWCL from 
Openstack GUI,
there was error that the floating ip could not be attached to the public 
interface of Packet Generator VM.
However we are able to attach floating IPs to other VMs from Openstack GUI.
We are just wondering why we could not attach floating ip to the public 
interface of Packet Generator VM.
Do you have any knowledge about such event?

Best Regards
Santosh Thapa Magar

-----Original Message-----
From: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 10:22 AM
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; 
'[email protected]' <[email protected]>; 'MALAKOV, YURIY'
<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

Hi Brian,

Thank you very much for the suggestion.
We will have a look into it and let you know if there is any issue.

Best Regards
Santosh Thapa Magar

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Brian Freeman
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 11:57 PM
To: [email protected]; Santosh Thapa Magar 
<[email protected]>; MALAKOV, YURIY <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue



The pub_key is pulled in from the robot properties.py

[testsuite/oom.git] / resources / config / eteshare / config / 
robot_properties.py

  94 GLOBAL_INJECTED_PUBLIC_KEY = "{{ .Values.vnfPubKey }}"


[demo.git] / preload_data / defaults / preload_data.json
   1 {
   2     "key_name": "vfw_key${uuid}",
   3     "pub_key": "${GLOBAL_INJECTED_PUBLIC_KEY}",
   4     "repo_url_blob": "https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/raw";,
   5     "repo_url_artifacts": "${GLOBAL_INJECTED_ARTIFACTS_REPO_URL}",
   6     "demo_artifacts_version": "${GLOBAL_INJECTED_ARTIFACTS_VERSION}",
   7     "onap_private_net_id": "${GLOBAL_INJECTED_NETWORK}",
   8     "onap_private_subnet_id": 
"${GLOBAL_INJECTED_OPENSTACK_PRIVATE_SUBNET_ID}",
   9     "onap_private_net_cidr": 
"${GLOBAL_INJECTED_OPENSTACK_PRIVATE_NET_CIDR}",
  10     "sec_group": "${GLOBAL_INJECTED_OPENSTACK_SECURITY_GROUP}",
  11     "dcae_collector_ip": "${GLOBAL_INJECTED_DCAE_COLLECTOR_IP}",
  12     "dcae_collector_port": "30417",
  13     "public_net_id": "${GLOBAL_INJECTED_PUBLIC_NET_ID}",
  14     "cloud_env": "${GLOBAL_INJECTED_CLOUD_ENV}",
  15     "install_script_version": "${GLOBAL_INJECTED_SCRIPT_VERSION}"
  16 }


[demo.git] / heat / vFWCL / vPKG / base_vpkg.yaml
112   pub_key:
 113     type: string
 114     label: Public key
 115     description: Public key to be installed on the compute instance


147   my_keypair:
 148     type: OS::Nova::KeyPair
 149     properties:
 150       name:
 151         str_replace:
 152           template: vnfname_base_rand
 153           params:
 154             vnfname: { get_param: vnf_name }
 155             base: { get_param: key_name }
 156             rand: { get_resource: random-str }
 157       public_key: { get_param: pub_key }
 158       save_private_key: false


-----Original Message-----
From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 9:35 AM
To: [email protected]; FREEMAN, BRIAN D <[email protected]>; Santosh 
Thapa Magar <[email protected]>;
MALAKOV, YURIY <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

ssh -v should allow you to see any mismatch in key error messages.

brian


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 8:23 AM
To: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; MALAKOV, YURIY <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

*** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***.
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.

BTW the password prompt is occurring because the private and public ssh keys 
are not matching.

brian

-----Original Message-----
From: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 3:49 AM
To: [email protected]; FREEMAN, BRIAN D <[email protected]>; MALAKOV, 
YURIY <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

Hi Brian

Upon digging further more we found that while VM is coming up it tried to 
access the metadata server and failed to get meta-data.
Our openstack environment consists of two networks public and private.
Public network is used to allocate floating ip, however during onap 
installation we provided the public network id
「openStackPublicNetId」 that is used for floating ips.
On instantiating vFWCL the packet generator VM was instantiated with three 
networks one with public ip[172.27.16.92], second one
with private ip[10.0.137.33] and last one with vFWSNK_vofwlsnk_unprotectedf152 
network ip[192.168.10.200].
The public ip [172.27.16.92]generated is not a floating ip.
So we detached public ip [172.27.16.92] interface, and 
vFWSNK_vofwlsnk_unprotectedf152 network interface ip[192.168.10.200] and
created a floating ip[172.27.16.94] and associated the floating ip to the 
private ip[10.0.137.33] of the VM. After reboot the
metadata was accessed and configured.

After that we tried to ssh the vm using the private key used for generating 
vnfPubkey, but prompt for password was displayed.
We used the image for ubuntu 14.04 from this url
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/trusty/current/trusty-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk1.img__;!!BhdT!zFKnJqudf
QVIYqd8GaR5YHYQ6YBfJikQr4ldSVh8W7E3hnWgUsOUbZJ5tbd-LNk$
We were able to ssh to a test vm [ubuntu 14.04] using the same private key.

・Is there any tutorial to deploy vFWCL in Openstack Environment with floating 
ip for accessing public internet?
・Is there any configuration to skip the password prompt while ssh to the VM?

We would be glad if you could guide us regarding this issue.

Best Regards
Santosh Thapa Magar

-----Original Message-----
From: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 12:06 PM
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; 
'[email protected]' <[email protected]>; 'MALAKOV, YURIY'
<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

Hi Brian

Thanks for the reply.

We looked into the Openstack and found that the vnfPubkey has been correctly 
referenced in the stack parameters.

We got following error when trying to ssh to packet generator VM.
[email protected]: Permission denied (publickey).
There was no password prompt message.

We also tried to ssh using the key in the robot but we were unable to ssh to 
the VM.
We got the similar error.
[email protected]: Permission denied (publickey).

We were able to ssh to the VM we created manually using the same vnfPubkey.

Following is the logs in the Openstack GUI.
We found that there are warnings on accessing metadata.
Could you please guide us what to do next to resolve this issue?

cloud-init-nonet[6.58]: static networking is now up
 * Starting configure network device[74G[ OK ]
 * Stopping Mount network filesystems[74G[ OK ]
 * Stopping cold plug devices[74G[ OK ]
 * Stopping log initial device creation[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting enable remaining boot-time encrypted block devices[74G[ OK ] 
Cloud-init v. 0.7.5 running 'init' at Fri, 30 Oct 2020
04:19:56 +0000. Up 6.81 seconds.
ci-info: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Net device info++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ci-info: +--------+-------+--------------+-----------------+-------------------+
ci-info: | Device |   Up  |   Address    |       Mask      |     Hw-Address    |
ci-info: +--------+-------+--------------+-----------------+-------------------+
ci-info: |   lo   |  True |  127.0.0.1   |    255.0.0.0    |         .         |
ci-info: |  eth2  | False |      .       |        .        | fa:16:3e:84:59:5a |
ci-info: |  eth1  | False |      .       |        .        | fa:16:3e:21:29:ea |
ci-info: |  eth0  |  True | 172.27.16.92 | 255.255.255.224 | fa:16:3e:49:49:29 |
ci-info: +--------+-------+--------------+-----------------+-------------------+
ci-info: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Route 
info++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ci-info: 
+-------+--------------+--------------+-----------------+-----------+-------+
ci-info: | Route | Destination  |   Gateway    |     Genmask     | Interface | 
Flags |
ci-info: 
+-------+--------------+--------------+-----------------+-----------+-------+
ci-info: |   0   |   0.0.0.0    | 172.27.16.94 |     0.0.0.0     |    eth0   |  
 UG  |
ci-info: |   1   | 172.27.16.64 |   0.0.0.0    | 255.255.255.224 |    eth0   |  
 U   |
ci-info: 
+-------+--------------+--------------+-----------------+-----------+-------+
2020-10-30 04:21:06,842 - url_helper.py[WARNING]: Calling
'https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://169.254.169.254/2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id__;!!BhdT!zFKnJqudfQVIYqd8GaR5YHYQ6YBfJikQr4ldSV
h8W7E3hnWgUsOUbZJ505fAJCM$ ' failed
[50/120s]: request error [(<urllib3.connectionpool.HTTPConnectionPool object at 
0x7ff834e3be90>, 'Connection to 169.254.169.254
timed out. (connect timeout=50.0)')]
2020-10-30 04:21:57,900 - url_helper.py[WARNING]: Calling
'https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://169.254.169.254/2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id__;!!BhdT!zFKnJqudfQVIYqd8GaR5YHYQ6YBfJikQr4ldSV
h8W7E3hnWgUsOUbZJ505fAJCM$ ' failed
[101/120s]: request error [(<urllib3.connectionpool.HTTPConnectionPool object 
at 0x7ff834e26850>, 'Connection to 169.254.169.254
timed out. (connect timeout=50.0)')]
2020-10-30 04:22:15,928 - url_helper.py[WARNING]: Calling
'https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://169.254.169.254/2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id__;!!BhdT!zFKnJqudfQVIYqd8GaR5YHYQ6YBfJikQr4ldSV
h8W7E3hnWgUsOUbZJ505fAJCM$ ' failed
[119/120s]: request error [(<urllib3.connectionpool.HTTPConnectionPool object 
at 0x7ff834e3b710>, 'Connection to 169.254.169.254
timed out. (connect timeout=17.0)')]
2020-10-30 04:22:16,937 - DataSourceEc2.py[CRITICAL]: Giving up on md from
['https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://169.254.169.254/2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id__;!!BhdT!zFKnJqudfQVIYqd8GaR5YHYQ6YBfJikQr4ldS
Vh8W7E3hnWgUsOUbZJ505fAJCM$ '] after 120 seconds
2020-10-30 04:22:16,950 - url_helper.py[WARNING]: Calling
'https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://172.27.16.72/*latest/meta-data/instance-id__;Lw!!BhdT!zFKnJqudfQVIYqd8GaR5YHYQ6YBfJikQr4ldSVh8W7
E3hnWgUsOUbZJ5rzXSsgE$ ' failed [0/120s]:
request error [HTTPConnectionPool(host='172.27.16.72', port=80): Max retries 
exceeded with url: //latest/meta-data/instance-id
(Caused by <class 'socket.error'>: [Errno 111] Connection refused)]
2020-10-30 04:22:17,954 - url_helper.py[WARNING]: Calling
'https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://172.27.16.72/*latest/meta-data/instance-id__;Lw!!BhdT!zFKnJqudfQVIYqd8GaR5YHYQ6YBfJikQr4ldSVh8W7
E3hnWgUsOUbZJ5rzXSsgE$ ' failed [1/120s]:
request error [HTTPConnectionPool(host='172.27.16.72', port=80): Max retries 
exceeded with url: //latest/meta-data/instance-id
(Caused by <class 'socket.error'>: [Errno 111] Connection refused)]
2020-10-30 04:22:18,963 - url_helper.py[WARNING]: Calling
'https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://172.27.16.72/*latest/meta-data/instance-id__;Lw!!BhdT!zFKnJqudfQVIYqd8GaR5YHYQ6YBfJikQr4ldSVh8W7
E3hnWgUsOUbZJ5rzXSsgE$ ' failed [2/120s]:
request error [HTTPConnectionPool(host='172.27.16.72', port=80): Max retries 
exceeded with url: //latest/meta-data/instance-id
(Caused by <class 'socket.error'>: [Errno 111] Connection refused)]
2020-10-30 04:22:19,976 - url_helper.py[WARNING]: Calling
'https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://172.27.16.72/*latest/meta-data/instance-id__;Lw!!BhdT!zFKnJqudfQVIYqd8GaR5YHYQ6YBfJikQr4ldSVh8W7
E3hnWgUsOUbZJ5rzXSsgE$ ' failed [3/120s]:
request error [HTTPConnectionPool(host='172.27.16.72', port=80): Max retries 
exceeded with url: //latest/meta-data/instance-id
(Caused by <class 'socket.error'>: [Errno 111] Connection refused)]
2020-10-30 04:24:16,387 - url_helper.py[WARNING]: Calling
'https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://172.27.16.72/*latest/meta-data/instance-id__;Lw!!BhdT!zFKnJqudfQVIYqd8GaR5YHYQ6YBfJikQr4ldSVh8W7
E3hnWgUsOUbZJ5rzXSsgE$ ' failed [119/120s]:
request error [HTTPConnectionPool(host='172.27.16.72', port=80): Max retries 
exceeded with url: //latest/meta-data/instance-id
(Caused by <class 'socket.error'>: [Errno 115] Operation now in progress)]
2020-10-30 04:24:23,405 - DataSourceCloudStack.py[CRITICAL]: Giving up on 
waiting for the metadata from
['https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://172.27.16.72/*latest/meta-data/instance-id__;Lw!!BhdT!zFKnJqudfQVIYqd8GaR5YHYQ6YBfJikQr4ldSVh8W
7E3hnWgUsOUbZJ5rzXSsgE$ '] after 126 seconds
 * Starting Signal sysvinit that local filesystems are mounted[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting configure network device security[74G[ OK ]
 * Stopping Mount filesystems on boot[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting flush early job output to logs[74G[ OK ]
 * Stopping Failsafe Boot Delay[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting System V initialisation compatibility[74G[ OK ]
 * Stopping flush early job output to logs[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting configure virtual network devices[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting Pollinate to seed the pseudo random number generator[74G[ OK ]
 * Stopping Pollinate to seed the pseudo random number generator[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting Bridge file events into upstart[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting D-Bus system message bus[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting early crypto disks...       [80G [74G[ OK ]
 * Starting SystemD login management service[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting system logging daemon[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting Handle applying cloud-config[74G[ OK ] Skipping profile in 
/etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.sbin.rsyslogd
 * Starting AppArmor profiles       [80G [74G[ OK ]
 * Stopping System V initialisation compatibility[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting System V runlevel compatibility[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting save kernel messages[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting regular background program processing daemon[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting deferred execution scheduler[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting ACPI daemon[74G[ OK ]
 * Stopping save kernel messages[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting OpenSSH server[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting CPU interrupts balancing daemon[74G[ OK ]
 * Starting automatic crash report generation[74G[ OK ] Cloud-init v. 0.7.5 
running 'modules:config' at Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:24:24
+0000. Up 295.00 seconds.
open-vm-tools: not starting as this is not a VMware VM landscape-client is not 
configured, please run landscape-config.
 * Stopping Handle applying cloud-config[74G[ OK ]
 * Restoring resolver state...       [80G [74G[ OK ]
 * Stopping System V runlevel compatibility[74G[ OK ] Cloud-init v. 0.7.5 
running 'modules:final' at Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:24:24
+0000. Up 295.41 seconds.
Cloud-init v. 0.7.5 finished at Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:24:25 +0000. Datasource 
DataSourceNone.  Up 295.47 seconds
2020-10-30 04:24:25,018 - cc_final_message.py[WARNING]: Used fallback datasource


Best Regards
Santosh Thapa Magar

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Brian Freeman
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 9:18 PM
To: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; MALAKOV, YURIY <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

Hmmm.

Check the resources used in the openstack GUI to make sure that the vnfPubkey 
was correctly referenced in the .env/parameter data
passed to openstack for the packet generator stack/VM.

What error did you get back from the packet generator - connection refused or 
it prompted for password ?

If you can not ssh into the VM then you cant confirm that routing is letting 
the vFWCL VM's pull the data from the internet they
need to boot (there is a cloud-init hook that does a wget to pull scripts down) 
but the first problem is why isn’t ssh letting you
in.

Cant hurt to try the public key in robot (you probably already did)

Item #2 is simply a by product that there is no status code since the HTTP 
transaction in #1 failed.

If you manually create a VM with your vnfPubKey can you get in via ssh ?

Check the logs in the openstack GUI to see if there were errors on the boot of 
the pgn VM ?

Brian


-----Original Message-----
From: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 2:37 AM
To: [email protected]; FREEMAN, BRIAN D <[email protected]>; MALAKOV, 
YURIY <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

Hi Brian

We were able to redeploy full ONAP in our Lab.
All healthcheck and healthdist passed.
We were able to instantiate vFWCL.
All the VMs needed for vFWCL were created in our Openstack Environment.
However on verifying the closed loop we get the following error.

VFWCL Closed Loop Test | FAIL |
ConnectionError: HTTPConnectionPool(host='172.27.16.92', port=8183): Max 
retries exceeded with url:
/restconf/config/stream-count:stream-count/streams (Caused by 
NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at
0x7fe1f139bad0>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111]
0x7fe1f139bad0>Connection refused',))

Also teardown failed:
Several failures occurred:

1) ConnectionError: HTTPConnectionPool(host='172.27.16.92', port=8183): Max 
retries exceeded with url:
/restconf/config/stream-count:stream-count/streams (Caused by 
NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at
0x7fe1f127fe90>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111]
0x7fe1f127fe90>Connection refused',))

2) Resolving variable '${resp.status_code}' failed: AttributeError: 'NoneType' 
object has no attribute 'status_code'

As you suggested that we should look up if pgn app actually came up in the VM.
We tried to ssh to the VM, but we were unable to log on to the VM.
For your information we are using our own vnfPubKey in 
integration-override-v3.yaml.
In openstack keys are generated with the values assigned in vnfPubKey and 
associated to the VMs created by vFWCL.
However we are unable to ssh to the VMs created by vFWCL.
We would be glad if you could provide some insight regarding this issue.

Best Regards,
Santosh Thapa Magar

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Brian Freeman
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 9:04 PM
To: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; MALAKOV, YURIY <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

Teardown phase tries to remove the model that was distributed so that we don’t 
fill up A&AI (I think) with models from health test
of distribution. Since the model didn’t get distributed it fails on tear down 
so you can ignore the catalog_service_id not found
since .... its not found.

Healthdist failure usually requires looking into the robot logs in log.html on 
the robot web page  and seeing who reported back
DISTRIBUTION_ERROR instead of DISTRIBUTION_COMPLETE. Its tedious because of the 
polling but look for distribution details that is a
query to SDC to show the results. This is also available on the SDC GUI for 
that model but sometimes its hard to find the particular
model since they differ only by a timestamp when using healthdist.

As a minimum for model distribution you need SO, SDNC , AAI and of course SDC, 
DMaaP, AAF all up. Also no one else sends
DISTRIBUTION_ERROR.

Sometimes you may need to restart a pod depending on which component issued the 
error.

Brian




-----Original Message-----
From: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 3:37 AM
To: [email protected]; FREEMAN, BRIAN D <[email protected]>; MALAKOV, 
YURIY <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

Hi Brian,

About "FAIL Variable '${catalog_service_id}' not found." issue, I’m writing to 
follow up on my email. I didn’t hear back from you.
I look forward to hearing from you!

Best regards,
Santosh Thapa Magar

-----Original Message-----
From: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 5:06 PM
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; 
'[email protected]' <[email protected]>; 'MALAKOV, YURIY'
<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

Hi Brian,
Because of hardware failure, we have reinstalled ONAP.
After execute healthdist check, error has occurred with this result. Could you 
please instruct us to resolve this issue?
"
Testsuites.Health-Check :: Test that ONAP components are available via basi...
==============================================================================
Health Distribution Test | FAIL |
FAIL != PASS

Also keyword teardown failed:
Variable '${catalog_service_id}' not found.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Testsuites.Health-Check :: Test that ONAP components are available... | FAIL |
1 critical test, 0 passed, 1 failed
1 test total, 0 passed, 1 failed
==============================================================================
"

There are some test cases failed in the log file log-after.html I confirmed the 
log file log-before.html before reinstall ONAP, and
saw no failed test here.
Please refer for detail at log-after.html, log-before.html


Please look at the following snippet of the log.

*healthdist error Log
TEARDOWN model_test_template . Teardown Models ${catalog_service_id}, 
${catalog_resource_ids}
Documentation:
Clean up at the end of the test

Start / End / Elapsed: 20201001 17:31:14.987 / 20201001 17:31:14.996 / 
00:00:00.009
17:31:14.996 TRACE Return: None
17:31:14.996 FAIL Variable '${catalog_service_id}' not found.
17:23:21.881 TRACE Arguments: [ ${service}='vFW' | ${catalog_service_name}='' | 
${cds}='False' ]


Best regards,
Santosh Thapa Magar

-----Original Message-----
From: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 11:10 AM
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; 
'[email protected]' <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

Hi Brian,

Because of some reason we had to redeploy onap.
After ONAP was deployed using helm command, we executed the healthcheck command 
and found that among
47 critical test, 45 passed, 2 failed.
The failed test were
1. Basic OOF-Homing Health Check
2. Basic OOF-SNIRO Health Check

We were not able to run robot srcipts needed for deploying vFWCL.

In our lab we have deployed full onap.
Does OOF is needed to run vFWCL and Scale Out use cases.

We are trying to implement vFWCL and Scale Out use case in our lab.
We would be grateful if you could tell us which onap components are not needed 
to run above mentioned use cases.

Best Regards
Santosh Thapa Magar

-----Original Message-----
From: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 6:54 PM
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; 
'[email protected]' <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

Hi Brian,

Thank you very much for the suggestion.
We will have a look into it and let you know if there is any issue.

Best Regards
Santosh Thapa Magar

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Brian Freeman
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 12:44 PM
To: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

Can you check that the pgn app actually came up ? The vm has installation 
scripts as part of cloud init that download a zip and run
an install. The error seems like robot cant rwach the restconf interface on the 
pgn.

Brian



Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S8, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone



-------- Original message --------
From: Santosh Thapa Magar <[email protected]>
Date: 8/24/20 9:10 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: [email protected], "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" <[email protected]>
Subject: [Frankfurt]vFWCL Verification Issue

Hi Brian,

We are trying to implement robot intantiation vFWCL in Frankfurt.
We have been following link for implementing vFWCL.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.onap.org_projects_onap-2Dintegration_en_frankfurt_docs-5Fvfw.html-23docs-2
Dvfw&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=Iv0yK235blYpJKmR21K9Z_vkstgJiXFOMDiFqVGEYpM&s=wRYGdLyQSVogKk_4IrlO
KEmUAvWN2aUmMnOzGGHFLzU&e=
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Robot-2BinstantiateVFWCL&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQic
vjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=Iv0yK235blYpJKmR21K9Z_vkstgJiXFOMDiFqVGEYpM&s=nAwXo5aLzpQpB9T_WiciKFQjhrny72uFsxESGjPZK_4&e=

Note: We have not used CDS to implemnt vFWCL.

After installing full onap we ran the robot scripts in onap-rke VM in following 
order.
cd /root/onap/kubernetes/robot
Step 1)./ete-k8s.sh onap health
Step 2)./ete-k8s.sh onap healthdist
Step 3)./demo-k8s.sh onap init
Step 4)./demo-k8s.sh onap init_robot
Step 5)./ete-k8s.sh onap instantiateVFWCL Step 6).demo-k8s.sh onap 
vfwclosedloop <pgn-ip-address>

Step 5.instantiateVFWCL script ran with passed result. Stacks were created in 
the Openstack.

For running the use case we ran the robot script mentioned in Step 6. for 
pgn-ip-address we used the public ip assigned to Packet
Generator VM created in Openstack.
We found following error in this step.
1) ConnectionError: HTTPConnectionPool(host='xx.xx.xx.xx', port=8183): Max 
retries exceeded with url:
/restconf/config/stream-count:stream-count/streams (Caused by 
NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at
0x7fb6643ca910>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111]
0x7fb6643ca910>Connection refused',))

2) Resolving variable '${resp.status_code}' failed: AttributeError: 'NoneType' 
object has no attribute 'status_code'


We would be thankful if you could guide us to sort out this issue.

Best Regards,
Santosh Thapa Magar































-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#22441): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/22441
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/76398449/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to