Hi Xu Ran,

On 29.03.2021 03:40, Xu Ran wrote:
> Dear Opasiak and Catherine,
> 
> I have noticed that the block thing of UUI’s merge into OOM is:
> 
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/118930 
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=1e966c5a-410d5543-1e97e715-000babff3793-f7ea0549a854ee69&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F118930>
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/119124 
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=43d07bfd-1c4b42e4-43d1f0b2-000babff3793-1e123c16f51c1874&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119124>
>  
> 
> 
> They’re all related to the new NLP server, however, since there’re some 
> several problems appearing in these two commits, we accept the result to 
> delay this new part to Istanbul release. We’ll abandon these two commits 
> and make further changes. And the H release plan of UUI will *NOT* 
> include this part.

No need to abandon. You can always squash the two and move ahead with a 
new patchset on one of the reviews;)

> 
> As for the commit:
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/119844 
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=430831be-1c9308a7-4309baf1-000babff3793-15fb88f07d0c1278&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119844>
>  
> 
> 
> This commit only contains the changes of E2E slicing service which are 
> some minor ones. 

Yes + there is an implementation of NLP server introduced by commit 
7643cc5b373b167000d676c48d741e830081f3ab but I expect that as NLP is 
delayed to Istanbul then this is just disabled by default?

> We hope that OOM team can review this change and merge 
> it. If there’s any problem with the E2E part, we’ll be free to change.
>   And also, Doctor @Dong Wang is the sponsor of the new NLP part, he is 
> also available to response the problem of this part.
> 
> We will attend today’s PTL meeting to make some more explanation, hope 
> we can reach an agreement.

Gating seems to be fine on those patches. My only concern, that I 
expressed in the ticket is what is the rationale for not providing this 
container update before the deadline which is M3?

Your REQ tickets say that you don't expect a need to update OOM 
configuration for this release...


> 
> 
> B.R.
> ---------------------------------------------
> Xu Ran
> China Mobile Research Institute
> No.32 Xuanwumen west street,Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China
> 
> Mobile: +86 15010868144
> Email:  [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> On 03/27/2021 03:05,Krzysztof Opasiak via 
> lists.onap.org<[email protected]> 
> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>     Dear Catherine,
> 
>     On 26.03.2021 19:13, Lefevre, Catherine wrote:
> 
>         Dear OOM Team,
> 
>         David and I we are trying to understand what it is left from OOM
>         Backlog
>         that the project team(s) need to consider before the next PTL
>         call (3/29)
> 
>         We understand from the TSC call (3/25) - SO, SDNC and UUI had an
>         action
>         but it was not clear that there were other projects.
> 
>         Here is our understanding and the path to move forward.
> 
>         After the following items are solved then we need to stabilize the
>         release and no more accept any OOM code submission except
> 
>         for *versioning, documentation and show stoppers blocking E2E
>         Testing.*
> 
>         #1 UUI
> 
>         Remaining code submitted to change version is
>         "https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/119844
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=46b413cc-192f2ad6-46b59883-000babff24ad-7502168be2f1c9a9&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119844>"
> 
>         I have reviewed it and did not notice anything wrong so I
>         believe it is
>         ready to merge
> 
> 
>     The UUI action was related to:
>     https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/118930
>     
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=96cdd1a2-c956e8bb-96cc5aed-000babff3793-7441e05435231c2a&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F118930>
>     https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/119124
>     
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ae05fae4-f19ec3fd-ae0471ab-000babff3793-f6bee883b61eacbc&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119124>
> 
>     Not the patch that you linked above. The one that you linked has been
>     created *yesterday* 40 mins before the TSC meeting which is 4 weeks
>     after the deadline for starting OOM review with new containers for
>     Honolulu release.
> 
>     In my personal opinion it's very unfair for other project teams to
>     accept such changes with a monthly delay. Think how much extra features
>     could CPS or DCAE Team implement if they had extra month for the
>     development...
> 
> 
>         The following items - we will follow-up if these are required
>         for RC1
>         containers
> 
>         It does not look like new code but more modifications of config
>         to build
>         UUI Container. To be confirmed by *XU*
> 
>         https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/118930
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f0e13dae-af7a04b7-f0e0b6e1-000babff3793-5eaad4d8761cd6f9&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F118930>
> 
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=a47f0bfc-fbe432e6-a47e80b3-000babff24ad-e702636d9b0b5453&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F118930>
> 
>         https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/119124
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=fdd4954a-a24fac53-fdd51e05-000babff3793-55475913da8ddb84&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119124>
> 
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=07a5321d-583e0b07-07a4b952-000babff24ad-6ac11a2aeca53cf1&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119124>
> 
> 
>     This is a *brand new* microservice that they are willing to add to ONAP
>     It's not a change in config, it's not any kind of bugfix, it's a brand
>     new Helm chart under UUI project.
> 
>     It was uploaded to gerrit a little bit after the deadline but it was
>     first sent to me via email so we decided to give it a chance.
>     Unfortunately when we start reviewing it more deeply multiple issues
>     has
>     been discovered but never fixed and I believe that we cannot compromise
>     the quality because of the deadline.
> 
> 
>         #2 SO
> 
>         We check the remaining open defects,
> 
>         SO-3584 - https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/119522/11
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ac9aa5c5-f3019cdc-ac9b2e8a-000babff3793-2c33c31e7d2a30ef&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119522%2F11>
> 
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=37e382ff-6878bbe5-37e209b0-000babff24ad-4af727887ea4b80c&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119522%2F11>
> 
>         (can we merge the code)?
> 
> 
>     As stated in the review, the patch itself is fine (that's why it has +2
>     from  me and Sylvain) but we are waiting for a successful gating in
>     patch that you referred below as this is actually where SO will start
>     making use of that. If we merge it just now it would be just a blind
>     merge as without the patch above we don't know if it really works.
> 
> 
>         SO-3590 - https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/119309
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31cf5339-6e546a20-31ced876-000babff3793-a8eb7c361ddb5e27&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119309>
> 
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=7c0eff7c-2395c666-7c0f7433-000babff24ad-9d6fd0d44e1a675a&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119309>
> 
>         (waiting for review)
> 
> 
>     Waiting for gating...
> 
> 
>         *SESHU, *
> 
>         SO-3473
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=e1cd66c7-be565fdd-e1cced88-000babff24ad-9b6b971174a78770&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fjira.onap.org%2Fbrowse%2FSO-3473>
> 
>         - suggestion is to descope the remaining item of SO factoring to
>         Istanbul - too many code submitted and not yet reviewed.
> 
>         SO-3553
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=d2d706b8-8d4c3fa2-d2d68df7-000babff24ad-710911c68ded527a&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fjira.onap.org%2Fbrowse%2FSO-3553>
> 
>         - https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/118331
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=c5a23f69-9a390670-c5a3b426-000babff3793-88b5f0c7eadcec63&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F118331>
> 
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=b5a00398-ea3b3a82-b5a188d7-000babff24ad-2c0d2ce12129518d&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F118331>
> 
>         - can we descope and shift it to Istanbul?
> 
>         CCSDK/SDNC
> 
>         https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/118284
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=e0647eb3-bfff47aa-e065f5fc-000babff3793-aa115ba8a23e365d&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F118284>
> 
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=b0398acd-efa2b3d7-b0380182-000babff24ad-4cd8bfca6accb446&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F118284>
> 
>         -- (version update + 1 big fix) Dan T to review the comments
>         from Morgan
> 
> 
>     I believe that Dan has already fixed the issue reported by Morgan. We
>     are waiting for gating to confirm this.
> 
> 
>         https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/117808
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=688fde52-3714e74b-688e551d-000babff3793-0ab6d8c12a2d43b6&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F117808>
> 
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=c5400328-9adb3a32-c5418867-000babff24ad-e8cac77324f766a1&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F117808>
> 
>         --  verified job ok, ready for review
> 
> 
>     I need to follow up with Alexander on this patch as I missed his
>     comment. Sorry for that.
> 
> 
>         CPS - OK For Honolulu
> 
>         https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/118995
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=5bf5e645-046edf5c-5bf46d0a-000babff3793-127381b38cb02780&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F118995>
> 
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=1ce1defb-437ae7e1-1ce055b4-000babff24ad-f02eadf288773474&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F118995>
> 
>         ) verified job ok, ready for review
> 
> 
>     It's marked as WIP as Bruno is working to address comments from
>     previous
>     revision. Nevertheless changes would not require releasing a new
>     container image. They just need to switch to use certInitializer for
>     their https termination on ingress.
> 
>     Considering the progress that they made in this release, their nice
>     cooperation with us almost from the beginning of the release and amount
>     of comments that they addressed I believe that it's fair to take this
>     patch even as a bugfix after RC0 as it would affect OOM only
> 
> 
>         OOF - OK For Honolulu
> 
>         https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/113414
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=09e47a5f-567f4346-09e5f110-000babff3793-9a434a737a2ed37b&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F113414>
> 
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=26742d43-79ef1459-2675a60c-000babff24ad-c6374855ff7d5692&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F113414>
> 
>         verified job ok, ready for review
> 
> 
>     It's not ready, it doesn't work. I got some hint from Krishna how to
>     fix
>     it so I'll give it a try this evening if it works we'll merge if not we
>     just postpone it. It's not a functional change it's just enabling
>     logging to STDOUT for OOF so I believe that it can be merge even
>     after RC0
> 
> 
>         Holmes - What's level of confidence that it will work? Can we
>         move this
>         to Istanbul.
> 
>         https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/117395
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=b514f4cc-ea8fcdd5-b5157f83-000babff3793-2d475082764a36ff&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F117395>
> 
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=9235dd10-cdaee40a-9234565f-000babff24ad-c6d9314de228eb06&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F117395>
> 
> 
>     Guangrong Fu made recently some fixes but due to bad certs in DMAAP we
>     haven't had a chance to see it in the action. After we have gating
>     results we'll be able to say anything more.
> 
> 
>         AAI - OK For Honolulu (required for Certification)
> 
>         https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/118248
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=e4592b0a-bbc21213-e458a045-000babff3793-aa7a3646d133fee6&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F118248>
> 
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ef44ab91-b0df928b-ef4520de-000babff24ad-7bcfb89218b9c689&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F118248>
> 
>         - verified job ok, ready for review
> 
> 
>     Waiting for gating results...
>     Code-wise looks fine. If it passes in the gating I'll merge it.
> 
> 
>         Multicloud - submitted before RC0
> 
>         https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/119125
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=e5ff3623-ba640f3a-e5febd6c-000babff3793-af0f070c60c1f0ea&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119125>
> 
>         
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ee9c325a-b1070b40-ee9db915-000babff24ad-e9894bd205478539&q=1&e=bb5ddae6-e181-4352-8e25-2bcfcc413086&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119125>
> 
>         - verified job ok, ready for review
> 
> 
>     Already reviewed;)
>     As I'm coauthor of this patch, Sylvain is the one to merge it but he is
>     waiting for jenkins job review before doing that. Code-wise looks fine
>     so as soon as we have results from jenkins I hope it can be merged.
> 
> 
>         *OOM Team*- do we miss  anything else? THANK YOU
> 
> 
>     There is one more bugfix from the SDNC (CCSDK) team that has been
>     submitted yesterday:
>     https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/119847
>     
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=53d0af33-0c4b962a-53d1247c-000babff3793-ebcb86fc8c9b8cc1&q=1&e=26b28653-b4cf-4482-aed3-4b5732aa0935&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Foom%2F%2B%2F119847>
> 
>     I'm working with them to find the best solution but I'm sure we'll sort
>     this out quickly especially that it's just a change in the helm charts
>     that is easy to gate.
> 
>     Best regards,
>     -- 
>     Krzysztof Opasiak
>     Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>     Samsung Electronics
> 
> 
>     
> 
> 

-- 
Krzysztof Opasiak
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#23077): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/23077
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/81584261/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to