Chris,

Thank you for more information.

Regarding the committees you referred to in OPNFV, actually:

-          Strategic Planning Committee and Certification & Compliance 
Committee are all Board committees, NOT TSC committee.

-          Polestar WG, MANO WG, and Test WG are all community-driven working 
groups. They were proposed by community, and organized by community. There is 
NO formal structure of those working groups in TSC Charter. In fact

o   Polestar only lived for about 3 months, and no more activity now.

o   MANO WG was formed only because MANO Project proposal was not approved by 
TSC. And TSC suggested to have a MANO WG instead of MANO project to coordinate 
several orchestration related projects.

o   Test WG was formed to coordinate testing projects and activities

You can see, from TSC Charter perspective, there is no formal structural 
components. When an interesting topic and/or coordination is needed, WGs were 
formed by the need of work, and driven by community. A WG may disappear if 
there is lack of interest (e.g. Polestar) from community.

For the specific need of merge of ECOMP and Open-O, an Architecture WG may be 
formed to enable the need. Once the mission is achieved and we have a 
successful first release, this Architecture WG may not be needed. One example 
in industry is that basically no participation or interest of Architecture WG 
in OpenStack so it disappeared in OpenStack.

In summary, an Architecture WG is needed to achieve this mission of merging 
ECOMP and Open-O, which is short-term of the first a couple of releases. But it 
may not be appropriate as a permanent, structural component in TSC Charter.

Just my 2 cents

Thanks
Bin

From: Christopher Donley (Chris) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 9:40 AM
To: HU, BIN <bh526r at att.com>; Ed Warnicke <hagbard at gmail.com>
Cc: onap-tsc at lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Charter

Bin,

A correction ? OPEN-O does have a Vice Chair and an architecture committee.  
Because we started by merging SDN and NFV orchestration, we needed a holistic 
view of the architecture. For example, we identified four different SDN 
Controller roles in the network, and needed to work out which module was 
talking to which controller to avoid a multi-writer problem. We also had to 
work through how the various components talked to one another.  Since this 
discussion was larger in scope than a single project, we found it helpful to 
have a group identified to do the work (in practice, it was anyone who wanted 
to participate).  Given the scope of ONAP and the complexity of merging 
OpenECOMP and OPEN-O, I think it would be useful to have a formal committee 
defined here, as well.

Also, it?s not that far off from OPNFV, which has had several committees (both 
formal and informal) such as Polestar, strategic planning committee, 
certification & compliance committee, mano working group, cross-project testing 
community meetings, etc.

Chris

From: onap-tsc-bounces at lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-bounces at 
lists.onap.org> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of HU, BIN
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 6:48 AM
To: Ed Warnicke
Cc: onap-tsc at lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc at lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Charter

Ed,

Thank you for confirming that there is no precedent of such structural 
components in other communities.

And thank you everyone for great volunteer work ?

Thanks
Bin
From: Ed Warnicke [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 6:20 AM
To: HU, BIN <bh526r at att.com<mailto:bh526r at att.com>>
Cc: Ning.So at ril.com<mailto:Ning.So at ril.com>; stephen.terrill at 
ericsson.com<mailto:stephen.terrill at ericsson.com>; onap-tsc at 
lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc at lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Charter

Bin,
      
fd.io<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__fd.io&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=oSTVwWDVUzrnY8bUMMEEiULrmy_0QxwvShbSWsoyi8I&s=f2k9eD1nx1FB1uBPzmVaHkXAnQfHU5jsaxGFIzoz1Tw&e=>
 and ODL do not have either sub-committee or coordinators defined in their 
charters.  Neither do they have Architecture Committees nor Vice Chairs.  In 
practice, both 
fd.io<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__fd.io&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=oSTVwWDVUzrnY8bUMMEEiULrmy_0QxwvShbSWsoyi8I&s=f2k9eD1nx1FB1uBPzmVaHkXAnQfHU5jsaxGFIzoz1Tw&e=>
 and ODL have from time to time asked for volunteers to go prepare a proposal 
for the TSC for various purposes, similar to what is happening here with 
volunteer subgroup of the TSC working on this proposal.

Ed

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:42 PM, HU, BIN <bh526r at att.com<mailto:bh526r at 
att.com>> wrote:
+1 for the name of ?Technical Steering Committee Charter?.

In addition, because we put the emphasis on the community, a simple and lean 
structure will help TSC achieve the goal of serving the technical community 
better. Thus I suggest that:

-          Remove the role of Vice Chair and Coordinators

o   Those roles are really redundant, and I never see it in e.g. OpenStack, 
ODL, FD.io, OPNFV etc. Correct me if I am wrong if you do see Vice Chair, 
Coordinator roles in the Charter of those TSCs.

o   Cross-project coordination are usually done by PTLs of those projects. They 
work very well.

-          Sub-committees are also redundant structure

o   Correct me if such structure is defined in OpenStack, ODL, FD.io, OPNFV etc.

Just my 2 cents
Thanks
Bin
From: onap-tsc-bounces at lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-bounces at 
lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc-bounces at 
lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-bounces at lists.onap.org>] On Behalf Of Ning.So 
at ril.com<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 12:11 PM
To: stephen.terrill at ericsson.com<mailto:stephen.terrill at ericsson.com>; 
onap-tsc at lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc at lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Charter

My preference is ?Technical Steering Committee Charter? to be consistent with 
the TSC name.  ?Technical Community Charter? can lead to confusions, as the 
charter itself is really about TSC?s structures and roles.

Ning

From: onap-tsc-bounces at lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-bounces at 
lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc-bounces at 
lists.onap.org<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Stephen 
Terrill
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 1:36 PM
To: onap-tsc at lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc at lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-tsc] Charter

Hi All,

In the F2F TSC regarding the charter, there as an item that we should take to 
the mailing list.

Charter name:  Should we call the charter ?Technical Steering Committee 
Charter? or ?Technical Community Charter?.  Note: The second option puts the 
emphasis on the community and the TSC is helping to ensure the operations for 
the community.

Please, opinions welcome as we are drafting the updates during this week.

Best Regards,

Steve.


[Image removed by sender. 
Ericsson]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ericsson.com_&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=r3pgCHr5hs-WgnwILuBxkZ6Zh6LeqKwJLfR0NovNhM4&s=sCVlq4goG80rg44j45K2Kf11fJ_Nl2v7vpanZzqG0Jg&e=>
STEPHEN TERRILL
Technology Specialist
DUIC, Systems and Technology
Development Unit IP & Cloud
Business Unit, IT & Cloud Products

Ericsson
Ericsson R&D Center, via de los Poblados 13
28033, Madrid, Spain
Phone +34 339 3005
Mobile +34 609 168 515<tel:+34%20609%2016%2085%2015>
Stephen.Terrill at ericsson.com<mailto:Stephen.Terrill at ericsson.com>
www.ericsson.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ericsson.com&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=r3pgCHr5hs-WgnwILuBxkZ6Zh6LeqKwJLfR0NovNhM4&s=HR4y_CA6Qt99uPnJ_nchFeRqgVrxEvgGRqVhWBUf8cU&e=>


[Image removed by sender. 
http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ericsson.com_current-5Fcampaign&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=r3pgCHr5hs-WgnwILuBxkZ6Zh6LeqKwJLfR0NovNhM4&s=pR-w0LvCWFoFyVVzRx0m3W8kgk-Tec4X1eo7TNdlJJs&e=>

Legal entity: Ericsson Espa?a S.A, compay registration number ESA288568603. 
This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis 
of the terms set out at 
www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ericsson.com_email-5Fdisclaimer&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=r3pgCHr5hs-WgnwILuBxkZ6Zh6LeqKwJLfR0NovNhM4&s=n6olHgWAAKC3bhFTWdTrHP-RdGP1JXt1j85SpII3Nso&e=>


"Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only 
for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may be 
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any review, re-transmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or 
other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you 
are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return 
email and delete this message and any attachments from your system.

Virus Warning: Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure 
no viruses are present in this email. The company cannot accept responsibility 
for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachment."

_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC at lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC at lists.onap.org>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=oSTVwWDVUzrnY8bUMMEEiULrmy_0QxwvShbSWsoyi8I&s=dBqv50lYqgKaFKfofi0FHoEZVjJ5PKCNNSe3T9zpx9Q&e=>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-tsc/attachments/20170413/56139704/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 386 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: 
<http://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-tsc/attachments/20170413/56139704/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 804 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: 
<http://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-tsc/attachments/20170413/56139704/attachment-0003.jpg>

Reply via email to