Stephen, this proposal makes sense.  Thanks.

On a related note, I'd like to refresh everyone's memory about the project 
lifecycle outlined in the TSC charter:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+TSC+Charter#ONAPTSCCharter-3.3.3ProjectLifecycleStatesandReviews



Briefly:

Incubation -- "Project has resources, but is recognized to be in the early 
stages of development." 
Mature -- "Project is fully functioning and stable, has achieved 
successful releases."
Core -- "Project provides value to and receives interest from a broad 
audience."  Also, states that core projects meet S3P/Platform Maturity 
requirements.

Note that approved projects start as Incubation, so all current ONAP 
projects are in Incubation stage.

Questions for the TSC:

- should we promote projects that participated in Amsterdam to mature? 
(understanding that each needs to go through an official maturity review)
- after Beijing, if mature projects meet a level of S3P/Platform Maturity 
(which may  be the same as the Beijing maturity requirements), should they 
be promoted to Core?
- while we used an ad-hoc "MVP" definition in Amsterdam to prioritize 
resources for the release, might we use these official definitions in 
future releases to prioritize resources?

Welcome the TSC's thoughts here.


Regards,
Jason Hunt 
Executive Software Architect, IBM 

Phone: 314-749-7422
Email: djh...@us.ibm.com
Twitter: @DJHunt
 



From:   Stephen Terrill <stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>
To:     "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org P" <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Date:   12/12/2017 05:21 PM
Subject:        [onap-tsc] Existing project reviews
Sent by:        onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org



Hi TSC,
 
When we first approved the projects, there was some flexibility allowed in 
terms of keeping release dependent information in the project definition. 
The projects definitions should be independent of the release.  Now as we 
go into Beijing perhaps its time to do that.  Here is a proposal for that.
 
Comments appreciated.
 
Best Regards,
 
Steve
 
 


STEPHEN TERRILL 
Technology Specialist 
POA Architecture and Solutions 
Business Unit Digital Services

Ericsson
Ericsson R&D Center, via de los Poblados 13
28033, Madrid, Spain
Phone +34 339 3005
Mobile +34 609 168 515
stephen.terr...@ericsson.com
www.ericsson.com 



 
Legal entity: Ericsson EspaƱa S.A, compay registration number 
ESA288568603. This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive 
email on the basis of the terms set out at 
www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer 
 [attachment "Projects Definitions.pptx" deleted by Jason Hunt/St 
Louis/IBM] _______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=mH25Fq9ofoQAY5qCSE1kGwAJ6KLXsQmjANXHrj9qAUs&s=t-O5ZSBOmR3CxgGi594vlNghZzAiiHYzukipMkor3zo&e=



_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to