This is good. Let’s use this in our project planning. I like it. We should modify the chart to reflect MVPs versus Non-MVP projects so to help us prioritize support and integration testing.
Stephen is pointing out a related but a different issue. Projects were approved at Incubation with a scope. Project scope should remain intact and projects should not evolve from their initial charter without TSC approval. We need to do that for existing projects before we decide elevation to Mature. thanks! Mazin On Dec 12, 2017, at 7:21 PM, Jason Hunt <djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com>> wrote: Stephen, this proposal makes sense. Thanks. On a related note, I'd like to refresh everyone's memory about the project lifecycle outlined in the TSC charter: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+TSC+Charter#ONAPTSCCharter-3.3.3ProjectLifecycleStatesandReviews<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_ONAP-2BTSC-2BCharter-23ONAPTSCCharter-2D3.3.3ProjectLifecycleStatesandReviews&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2dwD7a5k4V9cZl09O7uTpejnZMF8aa01W3yMqrrZC5Y&m=QKzrIhJ1MGnok0cegHg5H5yB8jNkOi-MXJ6yz_ixn8g&s=PgLSi5ffbx3Jx4uETSXjgeFLIEFRHwzkKaIHJxesn5c&e=> <Mail Attachment.jpeg> Briefly: Incubation -- "Project has resources, but is recognized to be in the early stages of development." Mature -- "Project is fully functioning and stable, has achieved successful releases." Core -- "Project provides value to and receives interest from a broad audience." Also, states that core projects meet S3P/Platform Maturity requirements. Note that approved projects start as Incubation, so all current ONAP projects are in Incubation stage. Questions for the TSC: - should we promote projects that participated in Amsterdam to mature? (understanding that each needs to go through an official maturity review) - after Beijing, if mature projects meet a level of S3P/Platform Maturity (which may be the same as the Beijing maturity requirements), should they be promoted to Core? - while we used an ad-hoc "MVP" definition in Amsterdam to prioritize resources for the release, might we use these official definitions in future releases to prioritize resources? Welcome the TSC's thoughts here. Regards, Jason Hunt Executive Software Architect, IBM Phone: 314-749-7422 Email: djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com> Twitter: @DJHunt From: Stephen Terrill <stephen.terr...@ericsson.com<mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>> To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> P" <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> Date: 12/12/2017 05:21 PM Subject: [onap-tsc] Existing project reviews Sent by: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> ________________________________ Hi TSC, When we first approved the projects, there was some flexibility allowed in terms of keeping release dependent information in the project definition. The projects definitions should be independent of the release. Now as we go into Beijing perhaps its time to do that. Here is a proposal for that. Comments appreciated. Best Regards, Steve <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ericsson.com_&d=DwMFAw&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=mH25Fq9ofoQAY5qCSE1kGwAJ6KLXsQmjANXHrj9qAUs&s=XvGXSx_Ea4QvSkMAHacw17-zx1fZV220lMdDaCcjDPA&e=> STEPHEN TERRILL Technology Specialist POA Architecture and Solutions Business Unit Digital Services Ericsson Ericsson R&D Center, via de los Poblados 13 28033, Madrid, Spain Phone +34 339 3005 Mobile +34 609 168 515 stephen.terr...@ericsson.com<mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com> www.ericsson.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ericsson.com&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2dwD7a5k4V9cZl09O7uTpejnZMF8aa01W3yMqrrZC5Y&m=QKzrIhJ1MGnok0cegHg5H5yB8jNkOi-MXJ6yz_ixn8g&s=ob8XV0jgUoxPGGSL6kZDlkEhcuen5D8uf66j0ODvviM&e=> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ericsson.com_current-5Fcampaign&d=DwMFAw&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=mH25Fq9ofoQAY5qCSE1kGwAJ6KLXsQmjANXHrj9qAUs&s=c8JdGqsaGek_1R_5kBru-Z06ka9aC78Wnc7YrE__ZaA&e=> Legal entity: Ericsson España S.A, compay registration number ESA288568603. This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ericsson.com_email-5Fdisclaimer&d=DwMFAw&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=mH25Fq9ofoQAY5qCSE1kGwAJ6KLXsQmjANXHrj9qAUs&s=imFECHFJqT3zAJOPdKV_s89KkOAdZh1o3XeAJ6T4f5c&e=> [attachment "Projects Definitions.pptx" deleted by Jason Hunt/St Louis/IBM] _______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=mH25Fq9ofoQAY5qCSE1kGwAJ6KLXsQmjANXHrj9qAUs&s=t-O5ZSBOmR3CxgGi594vlNghZzAiiHYzukipMkor3zo&e= _______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2dwD7a5k4V9cZl09O7uTpejnZMF8aa01W3yMqrrZC5Y&m=QKzrIhJ1MGnok0cegHg5H5yB8jNkOi-MXJ6yz_ixn8g&s=Nz1rRKo_fY1TRXD-F8mEUaF2MDQhXMy9IoT0yDgKJpc&e=
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
