(bcc’d to onap-tsc-vote) I received an email overnight pointing out the following error:
“Steady State” is defined in Section 2,b,ii as is documented below. The modification required to Section 2,b,i is to the “Startup Period”. I am closing the current vote, and we will discuss this at the TSC meeting. Best Regards, -kenny > On Mar 14, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Kenny Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > > Having received no responses to this email, since we have not yet formalized > a release plan for Casablanca, and since need a date rather than a release > name as the criteria (since release dates are subject to change), I am > putting forward the vote as follows: > > The TSC approves modifying the “Steady State” definition in Section 2,b,i of > the ONAP Technical Charter to be September 30, 2018. > > THIS IS JUST THE INTENT AND LANGUAGE, IT IS NOT THE VOTE ITSELF. The formal > vote will occur on the onap-tsc-vote alias, not here. > A plus-one, minus-one, or zero here on this issue is null and void. > > This will extend the TSC’s decision making timeline on the composition and > election process for the ONAP TSC by a full quarter from what is currently > reflected in the ONAP Technical Charter and 6 months from the original date > established in the ONAP charter when the project was launched. > > Best Regards, > -kenny > > Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager, The Linux Foundation > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, 510.766.5945 > San Francisco Bay Area, Pacific Time Zone > >> On Mar 8, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Kenny Paul <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Following up from today’s TSC Meeting on the TSC Composition discussion. >> Section 2 of the ONAP Technical Charter reads as follows: >> >> b. TSC Voting Members >> >> i. “Startup Period”: From date of creation of the ONAP Project a Series >> of LF Projects, LLC (“Project Launch”) until June 30, 2018 (such period the >> “Startup Period”), the TSC voting members will consist of one appointee from >> each organization listed as having TSC appointees on ONAP.org >> <http://onap.org/>. All TSC voting members will be listed on ONAP.org >> <http://onap.org/>. >> >> ii. “Steady State”: After the Startup Period, the size, makeup and >> procedure for determining voting members of the TSC will be as determined by >> the TSC and documented on the ONAP web site. >> >> A couple things of note here directly relevant to this morning’s discussion: >> - First at the TSC’s request the original “Steady State” cutover to a >> meritocratic based TSC was previously changed from the end of this month to >> June 30 to avoid disrupting the Beijing release. Changing this again would >> require amending the ONAP Technical Charter. >> >> - Second, limitations were established to maintain the TSC membership at its >> current level until the “Steady State” structure and elections. Opening this >> up to all include TSC membership from any LFN Platinum member that is not >> already represented on the ONAP TSC in advance of the “Steady State” >> elections will require an amendment to the ONAP Technical Charter. My >> personal recommendation is to keep the status quo on this item. >> >> - Finally although we had 19 Platinum Member reps appointed to the TSC, >> there were only 18 TSC members ever listed on the web page >> <https://www.onap.org/about/tsc> - our requests to the remaining Platinum >> member for a pic/bio info from were never answered and therefore nothing was >> ever posted. (Also there has been little to no participation since the 1st >> or 2nd meeting for what it is worth.) >> >> So in summary, the current size of the TSC based upon the ONAP Technical >> Charter (effective Jan. 1st) is 18 members and will remain so until the TSC >> sets the Steady State structure by June 30th, or amends the Technical >> Charter to do something different. >> >> Having provided that background my understanding of today’s proposal is for >> the TSC to stay “as-is” until after Casablanca. >> >> THIS IS TO ENSURE CLARIFICATION OF THE INTENT AND LANGUAGE, NOT THE VOTE >> ITSELF. The formal vote will occur on the onap-tsc-vote alias, not here. A >> plus-one here on this issue is null and void. >> >> The TSC approves modifying the “Steady State” definition in Section 2,b,i of >> the ONAP Technical Charter to be _DATE_. >> >> I am looking to the TSC to verify the above sentence reflects the correct >> vote on this issue and to provide _DATE_. >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Best Regards, >> -kenny >> >> Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager, The Linux Foundation >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, 510.766.5945 >> San Francisco Bay Area, Pacific Time Zone >> >
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
