Kenny, We have about 14 people on the bridge is the calendar invite wrong ?
Brian From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kenny Paul Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 8:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Confirming Context of TSC Structure Vote (bcc’d to onap-tsc-vote) I received an email overnight pointing out the following error: “Steady State” is defined in Section 2,b,ii as is documented below. The modification required to Section 2,b,i is to the “Startup Period”. I am closing the current vote, and we will discuss this at the TSC meeting. Best Regards, -kenny On Mar 14, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Kenny Paul <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Having received no responses to this email, since we have not yet formalized a release plan for Casablanca, and since need a date rather than a release name as the criteria (since release dates are subject to change), I am putting forward the vote as follows: The TSC approves modifying the “Steady State” definition in Section 2,b,i of the ONAP Technical Charter to be September 30, 2018. THIS IS JUST THE INTENT AND LANGUAGE, IT IS NOT THE VOTE ITSELF. The formal vote will occur on the onap-tsc-vote alias, not here. A plus-one, minus-one, or zero here on this issue is null and void. This will extend the TSC’s decision making timeline on the composition and election process for the ONAP TSC by a full quarter from what is currently reflected in the ONAP Technical Charter and 6 months from the original date established in the ONAP charter when the project was launched. Best Regards, -kenny Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager, The Linux Foundation [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, 510.766.5945 San Francisco Bay Area, Pacific Time Zone On Mar 8, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Kenny Paul <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Following up from today’s TSC Meeting on the TSC Composition discussion. Section 2 of the ONAP Technical Charter reads as follows: b. TSC Voting Members i. “Startup Period”: From date of creation of the ONAP Project a Series of LF Projects, LLC (“Project Launch”) until June 30, 2018 (such period the “Startup Period”), the TSC voting members will consist of one appointee from each organization listed as having TSC appointees on ONAP.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__onap.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=q20tjxs5gAaeVvLg3oc3GVNxvWq7z0VEXTTmRfYaFdo&s=nh2eL3VLrJei_VHmEmbS8-ksfGYgToHfBQd4wwhm4Vs&e=>. All TSC voting members will be listed on ONAP.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__onap.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=q20tjxs5gAaeVvLg3oc3GVNxvWq7z0VEXTTmRfYaFdo&s=nh2eL3VLrJei_VHmEmbS8-ksfGYgToHfBQd4wwhm4Vs&e=>. ii. “Steady State”: After the Startup Period, the size, makeup and procedure for determining voting members of the TSC will be as determined by the TSC and documented on the ONAP web site. A couple things of note here directly relevant to this morning’s discussion: - First at the TSC’s request the original “Steady State” cutover to a meritocratic based TSC was previously changed from the end of this month to June 30 to avoid disrupting the Beijing release. Changing this again would require amending the ONAP Technical Charter. - Second, limitations were established to maintain the TSC membership at its current level until the “Steady State” structure and elections. Opening this up to all include TSC membership from any LFN Platinum member that is not already represented on the ONAP TSC in advance of the “Steady State” elections will require an amendment to the ONAP Technical Charter. My personal recommendation is to keep the status quo on this item. - Finally although we had 19 Platinum Member reps appointed to the TSC, there were only 18 TSC members ever listed on the web page<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.onap.org_about_tsc&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=q20tjxs5gAaeVvLg3oc3GVNxvWq7z0VEXTTmRfYaFdo&s=W6wFPcd7KZxeC5ucGgc8Kn38NvUTvhPCroHYgX55480&e=> - our requests to the remaining Platinum member for a pic/bio info from were never answered and therefore nothing was ever posted. (Also there has been little to no participation since the 1st or 2nd meeting for what it is worth.) So in summary, the current size of the TSC based upon the ONAP Technical Charter (effective Jan. 1st) is 18 members and will remain so until the TSC sets the Steady State structure by June 30th, or amends the Technical Charter to do something different. Having provided that background my understanding of today’s proposal is for the TSC to stay “as-is” until after Casablanca. THIS IS TO ENSURE CLARIFICATION OF THE INTENT AND LANGUAGE, NOT THE VOTE ITSELF. The formal vote will occur on the onap-tsc-vote alias, not here. A plus-one here on this issue is null and void. The TSC approves modifying the “Steady State” definition in Section 2,b,i of the ONAP Technical Charter to be _DATE_. I am looking to the TSC to verify the above sentence reflects the correct vote on this issue and to provide _DATE_. Thanks! Best Regards, -kenny Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager, The Linux Foundation [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, 510.766.5945 San Francisco Bay Area, Pacific Time Zone
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
