Hi Vladimir,
Since I wrote this email, a bit of changes came into play (cf attached email).
There is the introduction of end-user advisory committee who help into defining
priorities and will feed in the usecase committee.
The "E2E Release Use Case Approval" milestone help into streamlining the work
before we do project planning.
More to come on this during TSC meeting this Thursday.
In case you have not seen this, Casablanca goals are being defined here
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+goals
Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287
From: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 1:25 AM
To: Gildas Lanilis <[email protected]>; [email protected];
onap-release <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Casablanca Release Timeline draft proposal for review
Gildas,
Can you please clarify what is "E2E Release Use Case approved"?
Thanks
Vladimir
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On
Behalf Of Gildas Lanilis
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 2:33 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; onap-release
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [onap-tsc] Casablanca Release Timeline draft proposal for review
Hi All,
During ONAP Break out session at ONS Los Angeles on March 26, 2018 a draft
proposal for Casablanca Release Timeline was presented.
Find
here<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+Planning#ReleasePlanning-CasablancaRelease>
the link toward the materials for your reviews and comments.
Please post your reviews and comments directly at the bottom of the wiki, that
will help everyone for transparency, avoid of duplicates and make our inboxes
lighter :).
Thanks for your honest feedback
Thanks,
Gildas
[HuaweiLogowithName].
Gildas Lanilis
ONAP Release Manager
Santa Clara CA, USA
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Mobile: 1 415 238 6287
--- Begin Message ---
Chris
As Phil mentioned, this is a subcommittee of the LFN end-user advisory
committee and does not need the approval, scope or charter
of our TSC. Phil can share status and plan.
Nevertheless, I agree that it is important for our TSC to review but we will
not slow down the process.
thanks
Mazin
On Mar 30, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Christopher Donley (Chris)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Mazin,
As we discussed, please make sure that we follow the charter in proposing
the end-user advisory committee (I.e, formal documentation of the purpose,
scope, membership, etc) so that the TSC can review and vote on it. I think it’s
a good idea, but I want to see the details and make sure we follow our
documented procedure.
Thanks,
Chris
From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)
To: Alla Goldner;
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> P;
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Action Plan towards Casablanca
Time: 2018-03-30 17:57:00
Thanks Alla for the summary.
Here is what we agreed to at the TSC meeting.
There are three work plans for Casablanca. The theme is increase
deployability of ONAP.
1. Functional requirements and use cases. We agreed to establish an end-user
advisory committee that will be driven by the equivalent of product managers
across operators who will help to set priorties that can accelerate
deployability of ONAP. The work of your committee on use cases and 5G
solutioning will help to provide options for the end-user advisory committee.
2. Platform Evolution. This includes some of your list items
a. S3P new target (including code coverage)
b. Backward compatibility
c. Improve modularity and simplicity of using ONAP.
3. Broader learning and education of ONAP.
The Education committee will develop a proposal for weekly Webinars.
I am working to assemble 1. My hope is to have 3-4 operators signed up next
week so they can meet with your team and get the work started.
Phil will make that committee official as a subgroup under LFN end-user
advisory committee. Until then, let’s not slow down.
We also discussed what we want to accomplish prior to the Beijing meeting in
June. We will discuss that further at the TSC meeting this week,
and also vote on the release planning for Casablanca.
Great progress by the team on Beijing. Most projects hit M4 already.
Momentum is amazing.
Mazin
On Mar 30, 2018, at 5:03 AM, Alla Goldner
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all,
I re-attach the picture which describes high level priorities as
discussed during the meeting called by me on Wednesday evening. I understand
this was discussed in details also during the TSC meeting.
What we had on the table was:
1. Leftovers from Beijing remained from :
a. Functional requirements (PNF, Scaling, Change Management, HPA)
b. Leftovers from S3P support
2. New S3P requirements
3. All new use cases and requirements coming to Casablanca (you
could see the variety during our meeting on Monday)
4. A different projects proposed extensions
5. Possibly, new projects potentially proposed for Casablanca
6. Architecture evolution related modifications
Clearly, this whole scope will not be accomplished in a single Release,
this is why we needed to see what would be areas of priorities.
Clearly, we may get additional input from the Service Providers, as
discussed, but in the mean time, in order to make progress, let’s assume these
are the priorities.
Now, in order to do constructive work and move forward towards Casablanca
Release, specifically for Usecase subcommittee, we need to see what ongoing
work matches the Deployability goal as defined and, additionally, extract
generic functional requirements from the use cases brought to the table/see if
some requirements brought to the table can be generalized.
I identify the following areas for our activities out of proposed
prioritized areas:
1. Leftovers of functional requirements from Beijing – as scope is
pretty clear, I would say that at this point the required actions are:
a. Have a detailed list of functionality proposed to move to
Casablanca
b. Negotiate with involved projects on this functionality and
resources assigned to these activities
2. All 5G related requirements:
a. A realistic plan of what can be implemented in Casablanca (a
subset of functionality discussed so far), based on available/emulated
VNFs/PNFs, 3GPP standards’ availability etc. with flows, needed resources,
affected modules
3. All external controllers related activities – this work should
be generalized and common principle should be developed on what we bring to
Casablanca in such a way that it can be utilized by several use cases. Some
initial work on this was also done in Beijing.
a. A concrete proposal on what we bring to Casablanca should be
worked on and brought
I suggested end of April as a deadline for the conditional approval of
the scope as discussed above. (Conditional is because some more detailed
discussions with the projects after this may rule out/or add some of the
requirements/functionalities.
For that, we need to get your revised high level proposals per (2) and
(3) by our April 9th meeting. Please talk to me in case of any questions.
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
<image001.png>
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=48JYuoWViAxqYm4QMz73ZJ8z16JrkkgsMzIxplOnf6o&s=vyClNy7bhgh0iRZTdGQawMmH9r2QAfx8DigmOH_5jyQ&e=>
<IMG_2615.JPG>_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=48JYuoWViAxqYm4QMz73ZJ8z16JrkkgsMzIxplOnf6o&s=9TDwWEnLD77lKvigAzbKqkPYdrcsU7RRrwCpW9pYgyA&e=
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
