Hi Chris, +1 on John's comments.
Some additional comments/questions. Up to Slide 5 to 8 are recommendations from ARC subcommittee. Are all recommendations are committed in Casablanca by various projects? If not, it is good to call the ones out that are not committed in Casablanca. Specifically interested in - Whether GVNFM and Plugin S-VNFM would be supported in SO in Casablanca. - Whether all relevant projects understand SOL004 CSAR in Casablanca. And if security of TOSCA CSAR intend to be supported in Casablanca. Thanks Srini From: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org [mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of John Q Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 6:26 AM To: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org; christopher.don...@huawei.com Subject: [onap-tsc] Casablanca Architecture presentation question Hi Chris Thanks for pulling this together. Two quick observation/questions The work on the standards alignment could be clearer on where it is impacting on Casablanca. On Slide 8 it is easy to miss the targeted SOL003 VNFM plugin for SO. I just have a quick question should the slide from 9 onwards reflect the proposed changes in Casablanca? If so the VNFM plug-in to SO could be better reflected in 10 and 11. I would suggest reflecting that the VNF LCM interface that SO consumes is SOL003 on slide 10 and 11. Regards John -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3469): https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/message/3469 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23744385/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
