Hi Zeng
Yes we agree that the VFC has a role to play in the ETSI-ONAP alignment,
however the following was also presented in the architecture F2F
(https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/8225716/Proposed%20ETSI%20ONAP%20Alignment%20Regarding%20Scaling%20-%20Vancouver%20v6.pptx?api=v2),
and various steps had being presented before to the architecture team.
To my understanding this was agreed and rolled up into the architecture
requirements. The wording of the architectural requirements
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+Release+Requirements). Please
note, that as this was approved under architectural alignment, it doesn’t need
an approved use case.
Chris, Anatoly, Gil, does this align with your understanding?
Regards
John
From: Zengjianguo (OSS Design) <[email protected]>
Sent: 21 July 2018 10:03
To: maopeng <[email protected]>; John Quilty <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Christopher Donley (Chris)
<[email protected]>
Subject: 答复: [onap-tsc] Casablanca Architecture presentation question
Hi
+1 on maopeng’s comments.
We already do a lot in ONAP R1 & R2, and plan continue work on ETSI NFV
alignment in VFC during ONAP R3. So why and in which usecase to try to do it in
another way?
I agree ONAP as platform , should be flexible and there may be more than one
choice to one same/similar feature, but may I suggest to try PoC in R3, and
show what the difference/advantage firstly, then do the following steps..
Zeng JianGuo
发件人: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] 代表 maopeng
发送时间: 2018年7月20日 9:41
收件人: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
抄送: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Christopher Donley
(Chris) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
主题: 答复: [onap-tsc] Casablanca Architecture presentation question
Hi John
Very interested in the ETSI SOL related discussion:
Some backgrounds from my experiences in VFC project and SO project:
In ONAP R1&R2, There is SOL005 interface between the SO and VFC, and
SOL003 between the VFC and VNFM(vendor or GVNFM).
In ONAP R2, VFC has started the work to align the latest SOL
interface. please see the JIRA: https://jira.onap.org/browse/VFC-635 and commit
some codes. In ONAP R3, VFC will continue to do the work.
In the VFC there already extists the vendor VNFM driver and do the
implication enhancement.
If interested the ETSI SOL interfaces and avoid creating a new wheels,
suggest working together in the VFC team and collaborating with each other.
Does it make sense? thanks
BR
Maopeng
原始邮件
发件人：JohnQ <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
收件人：[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
日 期 ：2018年07月19日 22:02
主 题 ：[onap-tsc] Casablanca Architecture presentation question
Hi Chris
Thanks for pulling this together. Two quick observation/questions
The work on the standards alignment could be clearer on where it is impacting
on Casablanca. On Slide 8 it is easy to miss the targeted SOL003 VNFM plugin
for SO.
I just have a quick question should the slide from 9 onwards reflect the
proposed changes in Casablanca? If so the VNFM plug-in to SO could be better
reflected in 10 and 11. I would suggest reflecting that the VNF LCM interface
that SO consumes is SOL003 on slide 10 and 11.
Regards
John
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3487): https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/message/3487
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23791374/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/unsub [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
