Thank @Parviz and others for your feedback. I created an updated version based on your comments and uploaded to the wiki page https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/EUAG+Survey
Ranny. From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> On Behalf Of Parviz Yegani Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 6:51 PM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] EUAG Survey Apologies for a rather long definition:) IMO, the purpose of ONAP is to enable a network of any size to automatically adapt to the requirements of applications in any telco operational environment. This should be done in a manner that applications are not constrained by limitations of legacy or new networks. The key to ONAP operations is a) abstracting the service attributes via service modeling tools and b) the underlying network infrastructure via proper data modeling technologies along with widely used configuration and management protocols. As such, the network automation framework has to ensure that the inventory database is always accurate and up-to-date (very important!!). Regarding Modularity ... ONAP platform architecture should include a set of fully pluggable components such as orchestrator(s), controller(s), interfaces/APIs (both NB and SB), protocol plug-ins, and applications. The "Modularity" discussion should focus on a design paradigm that can facilitate the evolution of the platform in an incremental fashion to guarantee successful implementation of the above platform capabilities. Regards, Parviz ------- Parviz Yegani, PhD Chief SDN/NFV Architect CTO Office, Cloud Network Solutions FutureWei Technologies, Inc. 2330 Central Express Way Santa Clara, CA 95050, USA Phone: +1 (408) 330-4668 Mobile : +1 (408) 759-1973 parviz.yeg...@huawei.com<mailto:parviz.yeg...@huawei.com> [logo_huawei] Leading Global ICT Innovations From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose USA) Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 11:27 AM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] EUAG Survey @Ramki Thanks for your comments. I will update the survey to reflect them. @Chaker If the definition of modularity is up for debate, why don't we let the end users chime in and have them provide their definition. I can remove the "modularity" from the scoring matrix and instead add an open question asking for a definition of modularity in the eyes of the end user. Better yet, we can make this a multiple choice question. I will need several possible answers in addition to my "Ability to use only a subset of ONAP modules that are relevant to your company" @Steve , @Parviz - Could you share some of the other "modularity" definitions you had in mind? Thanks, Ranny. From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Chaker Al Hakim Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 10:19 AM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] EUAG Survey Hi Ranny, Thanks for taking the lead on this. My comment is regarding the definition of "Modularity" in your survey. We spent significant amount of time at the architecture tiger team meeting debating the definition. You may want to wait for Stephen T., Parviz and other members to weigh in before you send the survey out. I will also enter my comment on the wiki as well. Regards, Chaker From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of ramki krishnan Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 12:01 PM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] EUAG Survey Thanks Ranny, nice survey. It may be worth adding another line as follows under "Please choose which best describes your company's strategic approach to ONAP" * We are committed to leverage some components of ONAP for our network service. We are currently making some progress towards this. Thanks Ramki From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose USA) Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 8:48 AM To: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-tsc] EUAG Survey Hi, Following a discussion on the TSC weekly call two weeks ago I started creating a survey that will be used to solicit EUAG input to ONAP. With the help of several community members we now have a first draft of the survey available for review: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/EUAG+Survey<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.onap.org%2Fdisplay%2FDW%2FEUAG%2BSurvey&data=02%7C01%7Cramkik%40vmware.com%7C9a052dece7dc48aa22ed08d6287e810e%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C1%7C0%7C636740921133499538&sdata=b5mHTCBeT8lgkib%2FJResdVkmPMPMfM7d41QJJnRPNJY%3D&reserved=0> Please feel free to use the comments section of the wiki page for any suggestions for additions or modifications. Ranny. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3832): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3832 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26654273/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
