Hi Robert,

I second the idea of having standalone / offline mode of ONAP installation.
It is indeed a requirement for us as we don't really enjoy the luxury of
open internet even in our labs.
We have similar version of offline repos ( nexus, mvn, cache ) to minimise
the dependency on external world and this SI is exactly what we would
prefer.

However I would like to understand the need for starting a different
project or placement under Integration project. As per my understanding,
the proposed solution is still based on deploying ONAP via OOM, where the
dependencies are downloaded one-time, cached and re-used within local
ecosystem. In this case, why can't this project be annexed within OOM
project's scope ?

BR,
Viswa

<http://www.verizon.com>

Viswanath Kumar Skand Priya
Senior Architect
Technology, Architecture & Planning



On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:36 PM Robert <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
>
>
>
> We are open for suggestions…
>
> IHMO, it would not hurt to have 2 different installers to give options for
> customers. i.e.: Openstack for example provides multiply installers.
>
>
>
> Our approach is clearly targeting narrow carrier requirements, where
> deployments are predictable, repeatable and performed without any external
> connectivity, additionally giving customers comfort knowing exactly what is
> deployed.
>
>
>
> thx
>
>
>
> /robert
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *Stephen Terrill
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 16, 2018 20:51
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Beijing Offline SI Installer
>
>
>
> Hi Robert,
>
>
>
> Were you thinking of an additional project to capture this, or under the
> integration project?
>
>
>
> BR,
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *
> [email protected]
> *Sent:* Tuesday 16 October 2018 16:28
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [onap-tsc] ONAP Beijing Offline SI Installer
>
>
>
> Dear ONAP TSC Members,
>
>
>
> During the ONAP Casablanca Developer Forum in Beijing we have promised to
> upstream our ONAP offline deployment tool.
>
>
>
> As of yesterday, finally we did hold to our promise and published SI (Self
> Installer) in ONAP Supporting Tools wiki:
>
> (the delay was due to development of additional the package builder which
> was initially done manually,  and the big self-extracting tarball was not
> suitable community – over 60GB)
>
>
>
> https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Beijing+OOM+ONAP+Offline+Deployment
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Beijing-2BOOM-2BONAP-2BOffline-2BDeployment&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=9F3pNUkzjE-2v1eTClkRVakDRN8GH7Bm-wt1lWkxoUyyDORTqf5MxNO_GrMBs0gZ&m=R4fV-lcamj5xlTGrUEFlysFg9mlaHjzY6XNPjRdAqNE&s=FtfUpibQb0z_w_vVyxiVOSS253eMgSiUP6t1SEaqW6A&e=>
>
>
>
> the code is already merged in Integration project:
>
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/70479
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_70479&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=9F3pNUkzjE-2v1eTClkRVakDRN8GH7Bm-wt1lWkxoUyyDORTqf5MxNO_GrMBs0gZ&m=R4fV-lcamj5xlTGrUEFlysFg9mlaHjzY6XNPjRdAqNE&s=tAX5o1QYvXkSjrOAcX16vkmqZ0zOfPGkLVihjdmPpg0&e=>
> Core of ONAP offline installer
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/70480
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_70480&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=9F3pNUkzjE-2v1eTClkRVakDRN8GH7Bm-wt1lWkxoUyyDORTqf5MxNO_GrMBs0gZ&m=R4fV-lcamj5xlTGrUEFlysFg9mlaHjzY6XNPjRdAqNE&s=vHzECDf94Xbi-efTf0E0_ApfU-1ljoSZVSXchwFSMDo&e=>
> Add downloading scripts of onap artifacts
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/70481
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_70481&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=9F3pNUkzjE-2v1eTClkRVakDRN8GH7Bm-wt1lWkxoUyyDORTqf5MxNO_GrMBs0gZ&m=R4fV-lcamj5xlTGrUEFlysFg9mlaHjzY6XNPjRdAqNE&s=bGOwgAevM74m00cVfLmeKrttZ9k2kwYp59d4HiupLS0&e=>
> Add ONAP specific artifacts lists for download
>
>
>
> Note: current version of offline SI supports only ONAP Beijing release and
> is script based, for Casablanca we are migrating to Ansible and that will
> be also up streamed.
>
>
>
>
>
> We would also like to propose to include similar functionality in ONAP as
> official project (we will follow the formal approval path).
>
> Of course current implementation is not suitable for such, but we are
> planning to submit proposal for ONAP Offline Installer prior Dublin Release
> Developers Forum to be in time for your review (targeting El Alto
> release).  During the forum, we could also answer all the questions related
> and listen to your feedback.
>
>
>
>
>
> In the meantime if you do not mind, we’ll open confluence page to start
> gathering industry and community requirements toward such solution.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you very much
>
>
>
> /robert
>
>
>
>
> 
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3920): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3920
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27377900/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to