Hi Bin, Thanks for the testing approach for multi-cloud. Since it is not realized it will be moved to OUTPLAN for the release. Are you looking for that additional testing to claim a new feature OR just for future reference? Please let me know. Jim
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 1:50 AM Yang, Bin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jim, Yang Xu, > > > > I had a following up action by last TSC call on the update of functional > requirement of “Consistent ID of a Cloud Region”, it is yellow since OOF > does not realize it in Dublin release. > > > > However, I assume it could be tested without oof in certain test cases, > e.g. vFW > > > > I try to explain a little bit how the test case could be done: > > Assume: there are 2 clouds, or 1 cloud with 2 tenants. > > Step1 : With curl commands to AAI or ESR GUI portal, onboard 2 cloud > region with : same cloud-region-id (e.g. RegionOne), but different > cloud-owner (e.g. CloudOwner1, CloudOwner2, respectively) > > Step 2: With VID GUI portal, these 2 cloud regions should be populated in > the dropdown list, deploy 2 service instances to different cloud region > respectively > > Step 3: Observe the created heat stacks on respective cloud regions > > > > The idea was described at *Test Plan 2: vFW Use Case covering"Consistent > ID of Cloud Region"* from > https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Use+Case+Tracking+in+Dublin+Release > > > > Hope this is clear, please let me know how I can help further. > > > > Thanks > > > > Best Regards, > > Bin Yang, Solution Engineering Team, *Wind River* > > ONAP Multi-VIM/Cloud PTL > > Direct +86,10,84777126 Mobile +86,13811391682 Fax +86,10,64398189 > > Skype: yangbincs993 > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Catherine LEFEVRE > *Sent:* Thursday, April 18, 2019 11:18 PM > *To:* '[email protected]'; [email protected]; > [email protected] > *Subject:* [Onap-usecasesub] !!! ONAP Dublin - Call for Action !!! > *Importance:* High > > > > Dear Use Case/Functional and Non-Functional Owners, > > > > I want to inform you about a decision that the TSC took during the TSC > call on 4/18. > > > > TSC agreed that, *if no feedbac*k provided to Jim *by 4/22 EOD*, any > requirement (use case, functional requirement, non-functional requirement), > currently marked in yellow/(red), not due to testing blockers/issues, > > will be moved to the Dublin POC section a.k.a no more be part of the > official release. > > > > *Please take immediate action and talk to Jim – thank you !* > > > > Best regards > > Catherine > > > > > > *Catherine Lefèvre* > > *AVP Software Development & Engineering* > > > > *AT&T Labs – Network Cloud & Infrastructure* > > *D2 Platform & Systems Development* > > *ECOMP/RUBY/SPP-NEAM-Appl. Servers/SIA* > > *ONAP TSC Chair* > > > > > > Phone: *+32 81 84 09 08* > > Mobile:* +32 475 77 36 73* > > [email protected] > > > > *TEXTING and DRIVING… It Can Wait* > > *AT&T* > > BUROGEST OFFICE PARK SA > > Avenue des Dessus-de-Lives, 2 > > 5101 Loyers (Namur) > > Belgium > > > > > > *NOTE:** This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging > to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally > privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the > individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or > taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly > forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately > notify the sender identified above* > > > > > -- Jim Baker Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager mobile: +1 970 227 6007 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4882): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4882 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/31224539/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
