Dear ONAP TSC,

I'd like to start the archiving process for the DCAE-D SDC plugin,

I understand that this was always the plan to replace DCAE-D with DCAE-MOD (see 
: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2020-08-19+DCAE+Meeting+Notes?preview=%2F84665296%2F84665349%2FONAP+DCAE+MOD+Architecture+Review+2019-10-1.pdf)

We can see very little activity on these 
repositories<https://gerrit.onap.org/r/q/project:sdc/dcae-d/ci+OR+project:sdc/dcae-d/dt+OR+project:sdc/dcae-d/dt-be-main+OR+sdc/dcae-d/dt-be-property+OR+sdc/dcae-d/fe+OR+sdc/dcae-d/rule-engine+OR+sdc/dcae-d/tosca-lab>
 (a few minor sonar fixes & cert updates & move to non-root) for the last year.
Moreover I think it's not good to keep running 2 separate tools that are doing 
a similar set of tasks (confusing for users).
We'll take the opportunity to also reduce the number of SDC pods for the 
deployment.

I've consulted with the SDC community & other PTLs + we did present this in our 
Arch review for Guilin and it did not raise concerns.

Let me know if we can proceed.

Best Regards
Christophe



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#6999): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/6999
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/76304480/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to