Hello, I didn't get any feedback, As agreed, I'm moving on with the archiving process.
Regards Christophe From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Lefevre, Catherine Sent: Friday, August 21, 2020 1:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Archive DCAE-D SDC plugin ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. Good afternoon Christophe, I would suggest to wait until August 31st, 2020. If no feedback from the community by that time then please proceed. Best regards Catherine From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Closset, Christophe Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 11:11 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [onap-tsc] Archive DCAE-D SDC plugin ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. Dear ONAP TSC, I'd like to start the archiving process for the DCAE-D SDC plugin, I understand that this was always the plan to replace DCAE-D with DCAE-MOD (see : https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2020-08-19+DCAE+Meeting+Notes?preview=%2F84665296%2F84665349%2FONAP+DCAE+MOD+Architecture+Review+2019-10-1.pdf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_2020-2D08-2D19-2BDCAE-2BMeeting-2BNotes-3Fpreview-3D-252F84665296-252F84665349-252FONAP-2BDCAE-2BMOD-2BArchitecture-2BReview-2B2019-2D10-2D1.pdf&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=_PGg0Sk-SiWhqGw6CyLTMThX1kBHEt_FnM8xJtEY8n4&s=JOOjVMHuRB-nKG1PbQJxwOb_6_R6O-U0NoL_ZujVpF0&e=>) We can see very little activity on these repositories<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_q_project-3Asdc_dcae-2Dd_ci-2BOR-2Bproject-3Asdc_dcae-2Dd_dt-2BOR-2Bproject-3Asdc_dcae-2Dd_dt-2Dbe-2Dmain-2BOR-2Bsdc_dcae-2Dd_dt-2Dbe-2Dproperty-2BOR-2Bsdc_dcae-2Dd_fe-2BOR-2Bsdc_dcae-2Dd_rule-2Dengine-2BOR-2Bsdc_dcae-2Dd_tosca-2Dlab&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=_PGg0Sk-SiWhqGw6CyLTMThX1kBHEt_FnM8xJtEY8n4&s=QGzILaWS6Q_0GBXEsfKgYDgAaa5XC-g16-KEdhdRmaY&e=> (a few minor sonar fixes & cert updates & move to non-root) for the last year. Moreover I think it's not good to keep running 2 separate tools that are doing a similar set of tasks (confusing for users). We'll take the opportunity to also reduce the number of SDC pods for the deployment. I've consulted with the SDC community & other PTLs + we did present this in our Arch review for Guilin and it did not raise concerns. Let me know if we can proceed. Best Regards Christophe -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#7035): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/7035 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/76304480/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
