I have not yet had any discussions with anyone on this, though I was out of town most of the day today.  My own personal take is that we apply what I always thought was the rule for build or renovate: if it costs less than twice as much to build vs. renovate, build.
 
Let someone other than the taxpayers foot the renovation bill unless it is more cost effective to renovate.
 
 
Glen Schumann
Winona, MN
 
 
H: 507.454.3056 W: 507.453.3567  W FAX: 507.454.1440
 
Visit my Family Home Page: http://www.hbci.com/~gschuman/home.htm
Last Update: March 12, 2000
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 6:06 PM
Subject: [Winona] Court House issue

I doubt that anyone will dispute the fact that the county court house is going to have to be gutted.  A building, no matter how new or old can sustain the intense water damage and not need to be totally rebuilt.
 
The issue is going to be, in rebuilding in the current structure and building a new structure.  It will be interesting to see architectual ideas about what is possible.
 
What has amazed me so far, is the lack of hysteria when the head lines and editorials so far have rasied the question of the viability of rebuilding and maintaining the old court house.
 
I don't know if we have anyone from the County Board following discussions on this forum but hopefully we can assist them in measuring the attitude of the general public about this issue as they explore their options as they move towards a final decision.
 
At this point I can only say that I have not heard any hard core protests against going onward to a new building.  One that would perhaps pull the various aspects of county government together for more ease of access to all the various components. 
 
What is your take as you move around the community?
 
Joliene Olson
507-454-1236
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to