Ah.. Yeah, I could be missing out on irc discussions... The one thing I can say is that the currect maven org doesn't reflect either discision, so there is still some work to do ;).
Dave Sent from my iPhone On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:40 PM, "Sean Kelly" <[email protected]> wrote: > I mentioned in our chat room before how if we really did need to > impose some kind of organization then it ought to be done with the > namespace feature already provided by Java: the package declaration. > I can't recall why that idea fell out of favor, though. > > I'm +1 for dropping the prefixes. > > > On 2010.Jul.22, at 9.13p, David M Woollard wrote: > >> I think this view conflicts with OODT-5 [1]. For my own two cents, >> I think simplicity should trump previous historical organization, >> so I would rather see the prefixes removed. >> >> Anyone else have an opinion on the subject? >> >> -Dave >> >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-5 >> >> >> On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Sean Kelly wrote: >> >>> I believe the overall goal is to have two part names for all >>> modules: >>> >>> — cas-* for catalog/archive components >>> — grid-* for traditional oodt profile & product components >>> — oodt-* for common components >>> >>> So the correct dependency is cas-filemgr and the correct version >>> should be ${oodt.version}, aka 0.1-incubating. >>> >>> I think. >>> >>> >>>> In addition to the jug/s problem Sean found, I have noticed that >>>> in two cases components (curator and crawler) depended on a >>>> filemgr-1.9-dev.jar rather than the cas-filemgr-0.1- >>>> incubating.jar. I have changed these over for the time being (see >>>> r966887 and r966889), but I wanted those more knowledgeable of >>>> these three components know. >>> >> >
