No worries... Just encouraging discussion. Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:50 PM, "Chris Mattmann" <[email protected] > wrote: > Guys the artifact ids make sense. I'll send a longer rely shortly > but please don't change them yet. > > Cheers, > Chris > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Woollard, David M (388J)" <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:43:14 > To: [email protected]<[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected] > > > Subject: Re: couple more pom issues > > Ah.. Yeah, I could be missing out on irc discussions... The one thing > I can say is that the currect maven org doesn't reflect either > discision, so there is still some work to do ;). > > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:40 PM, "Sean Kelly" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I mentioned in our chat room before how if we really did need to >> impose some kind of organization then it ought to be done with the >> namespace feature already provided by Java: the package declaration. >> I can't recall why that idea fell out of favor, though. >> >> I'm +1 for dropping the prefixes. >> >> >> On 2010.Jul.22, at 9.13p, David M Woollard wrote: >> >>> I think this view conflicts with OODT-5 [1]. For my own two cents, >>> I think simplicity should trump previous historical organization, >>> so I would rather see the prefixes removed. >>> >>> Anyone else have an opinion on the subject? >>> >>> -Dave >>> >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-5 >>> >>> >>> On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Sean Kelly wrote: >>> >>>> I believe the overall goal is to have two part names for all >>>> modules: >>>> >>>> — cas-* for catalog/archive components >>>> — grid-* for traditional oodt profile & product components >>>> — oodt-* for common components >>>> >>>> So the correct dependency is cas-filemgr and the correct version >>>> should be ${oodt.version}, aka 0.1-incubating. >>>> >>>> I think. >>>> >>>> >>>>> In addition to the jug/s problem Sean found, I have noticed that >>>>> in two cases components (curator and crawler) depended on a >>>>> filemgr-1.9-dev.jar rather than the cas-filemgr-0.1- >>>>> incubating.jar. I have changed these over for the time being (see >>>>> r966887 and r966889), but I wanted those more knowledgeable of >>>>> these three components know. >>>> >>> >>
