What are the reasons? Is it "just" that there is no appropriate infrastructure in place, or is there some general rule that Apache projects must run on svn instead of something else?
I'm asking because currently OOo runs on hg, and the short time we did run on svn (after cvs, before hg), things were not working really ideally for us. -Stephan On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]>wrote: > Not at this time, no. FWIW our Subversion server is very responsive, > even for largish codebases (yay SSDs). > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Damjan Jovanovic <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Mon, June 13, 2011 3:37:53 PM > > Subject: Re: Proposed short term goals > > > > OO.o is a very large project, it might be overkill for Subversion. Is > > Git an option? > > > > Damjan >
