It strikes me that there are two different wikis being talked about right now.

One is one that we need in the podling for incubation activities.

The other(s) are wikis that are part of the OpenOffice.org infrastructure for a 
variety of purposes and may be public facing in different ways.

I'm not sure they should be comingled at this point.  After all, something we 
may need quickly in the podling is a wiki where we gather around the campfire 
on what the others are and what to do with them, how long will they stay where 
they are, etc.

 - Dennis

PS: I know that the LibreOffice folk have been rapidly rebranding and reissuing 
user documentation as well, along with on-line and off-line help.  I am not 
sure whether it is all Creative Commons Attribution (some have that as part of 
a dual licensing, it appears, others seem to be rather murky concerning what 
the license might be), but I suspect we need to give some consideration to 
whether and how that effort is accommodated.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Peters [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 05:55
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Wiki for the project

What will happen to the existing wiki at
   http://wiki.services.openoffice.org
which has quite some content (including
the main documentation pieces)?

Would we maintain two wikis or merge
into Apache infrastructure? How can we
migrate existing content?

I'd be eager to help with migration efforts (I
have admin rights on the wiki).

Frank

> +1 on the wiki request.
>
> Mentors,some advice, please, on how we make this happen?  Is things
> something that PPMC members have rights to do? Or do we ask the IPMC?  Or do
> we enter a request in the Infrastructure list?  Or some Infrastructure issue
> tracking system?
>
> I'm volunteering to do the leg work (or is it finger work?) if someone can
> point me in the right direction.
>
> Also, what level of approval in the project is typically needed for routine
> requests like this?  Is a +1 with no objections sufficient?  Or do projects
> typically have a more elaborate voting procedure for this?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Rob
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Raphael Bircher<[email protected]>  wrote:
>
>> Hi at all
>>
>> On http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html there is no
>> wiki emptry. We should use the incubator wiki to collect informations, or we
>> get a seperate wiki for OOo?
>>
>> If we have to use the incubator wike, how we have to marke OOo pages. It is
>> ok, if every site beginns with "OOo"?
>>
>> Greetings Raphael
>> --
>> My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
>>
>

Reply via email to