hehehe... we've got way more options, before we need to turn to Alfresco :-P
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 00:41, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: > An Aside: > > The Libre Office documentation team is using Alfresco. Not sure they are > doing anything beyond using the document-management features, although there > is web content management there too. > > Jean Hollis Weber has direct experience that might be useful. > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 17:41 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Podling website > > Anakia is "sooooo last decade" technology and has some requirements > for everybody that wants to use it (eg. java :-) > > If the new CMS can be used, then I'd recommend going with that. It > would be nice to get the community working with that today, as it > should be a good tool to use in the long-term. (Anakia gets to be a > pain for larger sites) > > The CMS is newer than that documentation, which may be why it "prefers" > anakia. > > Please take a look, and I can help with any authz bits or other setup > (just lemme know what I need to do). > > IOW, my +1 is for the CMS. If we find that the community doesn't like > it, then we can make another choice for the long-term site. > > Cheers, > -g > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:26, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >> Our website link is: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/ >> >> Astute observers may notice that nothing is there. I'd like to get a basic >> podling web site up there ASAP, so we can put out the "welcome mat", have a >> place to report status and accomplishments, list committers, etc. As we get >> an issue tracker up and other services up, they would be linked to from this >> site as well. This could transition into the TLP's website, or it could be >> tossed out once we graduate. In either case, I think we want something >> there for now. >> >> I've been reading through the podling documentation and I see there is some >> relevant advice: >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html >> >> Essentially, the website must meet certain requirements for navigation, >> content, etc. We can use whatever tool we want to generate it, but Apache >> Velocity Anakia >> <http://velocity.apache.org/anakia/releases/anakia-1.0/>appears to be >> preferred. I don't have a strong preference, but it seems to >> me that gaining some familiarity with that tool would be a generally good >> thing for me to do. So I can take a look. >> >> We need to check the source and generated site into SVN. >> >> Any objections to putting the web site here using Velocity Anakia? Would >> these directories conflict with anything that we are importing from the OOo >> source tree? >> >> /site/src >> /site/gen >> >> -Rob >> > >
