On 16/06/2011 12:52, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 16 June 2011 12:00, Sam Ruby<[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:47 AM, IngridvdM<[email protected]>
wrote:
I am really in favor of going without anyone being named leader or
manager
or any name that could create the impression that this person has more
rights than the others. Maybe we can choose 'contact' as a neutral
description in case something turns out to be needed? Or is there even a
more neutral word?
The only 'contact' that people need for this project is
[email protected].
If this list grows too large or too busy, then we can create
additional 'contacts' in the form of more mailing lists.
OK, sounds sensible to try using what already exists until there is a good
reason not too :-)
Let me test the system ;-)
<snip what="a description of why trademark permission is required"/>
So what I'm asking for is permission to use the OOo Trademark and general
community support.
ASSUMPTION: The OOo trademark is assigned to the ASF as expected
First point of call is the ASF trademark policy [1]. If you are
confident your use complies with the policy then no formal permission is
required.
If you feel you need formal permission then [email protected] is the
contact point as described in the policy.
The trademarks committee will either grant or refuse permission (usually
after consulting with the OO.o PMC).
Ross
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/
--
[email protected]
@rgardler
