Hi Sam, *, 2011/6/16 Sam Ruby <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:47 AM, IngridvdM <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I am really in favor of going without anyone being named leader or manager >> or any name that could create the impression that this person has more >> rights than the others. Maybe we can choose 'contact' as a neutral >> description in case something turns out to be needed? Or is there even a >> more neutral word? > > The only 'contact' that people need for this project is > [email protected].
As long as we're talking about people like us. ;-) But: what's with an enduser in Nagano, japan or an enduser in Chapéco, Brasil? > If this list grows too large or too busy, then we can create > additional 'contacts' in the form of more mailing lists. Is it intended from NewOOo to deliver final products to the market? If yes, than IMHO we should think *right now* about an infrastructure for these parts of the project. else ... Or do you think that there are too many unstability still in the process? Nevertheless: The earlier you start these national projects, the more uncertainty is removed from the market. IMHO that was the question from Kazunari Hirano. https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#label/...ApacheOOo/13092fd2961dd406 Unfortunately his has now answer until now. If would be fine, if a "almighty" could answer the questions of our friends from Japan. 0,02 eurocents M.
