Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos) On 18 Jun 2011, at 18:34, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ross, > > Drew had a long description. If that gives you any clarity. It does now I've read it more carefully, thanks (and to Drew) > >> Can you please clarify the legal status of the content on the forums? > > This is apparently the license: http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use I think this ought to be discussed on legal-discuss, specifically 3a which indicates "some materials" may be under terms different to these, and 4c which gives a right to sublicence but not a copyright grant, thus we can't relicence. 4e indicates that some "projects" might be under different terms requiring a CLA. As ever (for me) reading the T&Cs give me more questions than answers. Ross > > Here is what Zoltan wrote: > > On Jun 18, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote: > >> Hi Andy, >> >> 2011.06.18. 15:46 keltezéssel, Andy Brown írta: >>> Hi Zoltan, > > snip. > >>> >>> Good to see you here. :) Terry and I have been in contact an he corrected >>> me on his role as Admin. He also told me that the license for the Forums >>> is Copyleft which, if I understand correctly will prevent them from being >>> on ASF servers. If they are part of the grant then I guess that could >>> change. I am looking as some alternate options in case ASF can not host >>> the forums. >> The forums have link to the terms of use: http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use >> This link was on all the time while the forum runs. >> For my best knowledge, never was problem wit that. >> >> Now it is contain ASF 2.0 license for codes, I see no problems to licensing. >> Usually no source codes submitted to forums. >> >> Zoltan > > > Regards, > Dave > >> We've been told code is Apache licensed, but what about the content? >> >> This same question applies to the content on the user mail lists (asked >> about elsewhere in this thread). > > >> >> Ross >> >> Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos) >> >> On 18 Jun 2011, at 18:14, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jun 18, 2011, at 9:33 AM, eric b wrote: >>> >>>> OOops, sorry, should read: >>>> >>>> "Can someone explain why OOo4Kids and OOoLight are missing in this list ?" >>> >>> Thanks for the reminder. >>> >>> As for explanations the Apache podling and committers are still getting >>> organized. The project website is just there and we had our first commits >>> in our SVN repos just last night - the website. We are waiting on Wikis. >>> Haven't decided on Bugzilla vs. JIRA ... >>> >>> Keep watching and tell use what you need. "Patches are welcome", but we >>> don't have much to patch yet. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Dave >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards,, >>>> Eric Bachard >>>> >>>> -- >>>> qɔᴉɹə >>>> Education Project: >>>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project >>>> Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page >>>> L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org >>>> Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
