On 18 June 2011 19:31, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 18, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > >> Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos) >> >> On 18 Jun 2011, at 18:34, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Ross, >>> >>> Drew had a long description. If that gives you any clarity. >> >> It does now I've read it more carefully, thanks (and to Drew) >> >>> >>>> Can you please clarify the legal status of the content on the forums? >>> >>> This is apparently the license: http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use >> >> I think this ought to be discussed on legal-discuss, specifically 3a which >> indicates "some materials" may be under terms different to these, and 4c >> which gives a right to sublicence but not a copyright grant, thus we can't >> relicence. 4e indicates that some "projects" might be under different terms >> requiring a CLA. >> >> As ever (for me) reading the T&Cs give me more questions than answers. > > Me too! So, who should take it to legal-discuss? Sam? Someone from the PPMC?
Someone from the PPMC (but before someone does that see my later reply to Joe in this thread). For information Sam is VP Legal but he does not where that hat on this list. If you want him to speak as VP Legal we need to engage him where he has the backing of the legal committee (which includes real lawyers). Ross
