On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Dick Groskamp <[email protected]>wrote:
> Op 20-6-2011 14:33, Rob Weir schreef: > > I'm having difficulty reconciling the openoffice.org email forwarding >> service with how Apache projects work. >> >> Having such an address appears to suggest that the person is >> representing the project,or at the very least is a member of the >> project. But we speak as individuals, both in the project and >> externally. If we're suggesting that we represent the project, then >> that is incorrect. There are exceptions, as outlined in the "multiple >> hats" description [1] , where a PMC Chair or other Apache officers >> might need to speak authoritatively on policy matters. But that is >> not the typical case. >> >> And remember, committers are given email forwards via an a.o email >> address. So there is no functional requirement that I can see for an >> OOo address, other than the conventional postmaster and admin >> addresses. >> >> +1 I agree. If the same service can be delivered with a.o-email, why > hang on to OOo-email. > That might complicate matters unnessisarily > > [email protected] > > -1 I think making the switch will complicate things even more. > -- > DiGro > > Windows 7 and OpenOffice.org 3.3 > Scanned with Ziggo uitgebreide Internetbeveiliging (F-Secure) > > -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org
