On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 16:26, Pedro F. Giffuni <[email protected]> wrote: > (Sorry my previous message only went private) > > --- On Thu, 6/23/11, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > > (Snipped the irregexp stuff) > >> > much better than writing our own ;-). >> >> PCRE also has C++ wrappers, and *is* packaged up and >> delivered as a library. >> > > Hmm.. and it's documented: > http://www.daemon.de/PCRE > > One thing to take into account though: > > PCRE --> BSD licensed > PCRE++ --> LGPL > > I certainly won't object to PCRE++ if developers feel more > comfortable with it, but if we use PCRE++ it will have to > be a dependency because we cannot bring it directly to the > tree. It wouldn't make much sense to design our own C++ > wrapper.
I was talking about the C++ wrappers that are part of PCRE itself. For example: http://vcs.pcre.org/viewvc/code/trunk/pcrecpp.h?view=markup Cheers, -g
