--- On Thu, 6/23/11, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: ... > > I was talking about the C++ wrappers that are part of PCRE > itself. >
Ah didn't know about those ... no objection at all. FWIW, since irregexp actually replaced PCRE in Chrome I would expect it to be faster but then it also does some weird things in order to get something around 10% improvement. I agree PCRE is a fine and working solution. cheers, Pedro.
