On Jun 29, 2011 9:40 AM, "Michael Stahl" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 29.06.2011 15:03, Greg Stein wrote: >> >> Branches can be named whatever we'd like. My own preference would be >> to call this: /branches/3.4.x >> >> The "OOO" is awfully redundant, and the last digit ("0") doesn't make >> sense since we would be releasing patches from the branch such as >> 3.4.1. The "3.4.x" naming is used by many products, and it has worked >> out very well. > > > it wouldn't be a surprise to me if the reason for the "OOO340" name would be that it has to be exactly 3 letters followed by exactly 3 digits, or otherwise some tooling breaks. > > for example, the 2.4.x CVS release branch was called OOH680 (what the heck does that mean?)
Oh, dear. ... I don't even want to believe that tooling does this... oy. > > indeed, why not "3.4.x" > > -- > Q: How many Prolog programmers to change a lightbulb? > A: no. *THAT* is hilarious. Cheers, -g
