Am 06/29/2011 03:39 PM, schrieb Michael Stahl:
On 29.06.2011 15:03, Greg Stein wrote:
Branches can be named whatever we'd like. My own preference would be
to call this: /branches/3.4.x
The "OOO" is awfully redundant, and the last digit ("0") doesn't make
sense since we would be releasing patches from the branch such as
3.4.1. The "3.4.x" naming is used by many products, and it has worked
out very well.
it wouldn't be a surprise to me if the reason for the "OOO340" name
would be that it has to be exactly 3 letters followed by exactly 3
digits, or otherwise some tooling breaks.
for example, the 2.4.x CVS release branch was called OOH680 (what the
heck does that mean?)
oh yes, right, I remember there was a special purpose for these naming
schema. Let's see what Heiner will tell us. :-P
Marcus
