On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Gavin McDonald <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, 12 July 2011 5:11 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org (was Re: Ooo blog) > > > > > Am 07/12/2011 08:55 AM, schrieb Pavel Janík: > > >> It seems to me that a lot of the problem arises in keeping the > > development project and the product brand names exactly the same. > > > > > > Another proposal: > > > > > > Product name: OpenOffice.org. > > > > > > Project name: Apache OpenOffice.org. > > > > > > I'm strongly against mixing OOo and OO here. > > > > +1 > > > > Keep it simpe for the users and don't make any possibility for > > misunderstandings. > > With domain names for ALL Apache projects coming under the > pattern of $projectname.apache.org how you propose that > would work if Apache OpenOffice.org is the project name? > > (only openofficeorg.apache.org springs to mind if you intend to > keep org in the project name) > > (And a shocking name that becomes imho) > > Thanks > > Gav... > Since apache will own the openoffice.org domain you can as easily put a redirector from http://ooo.apache.org to http://apache.openoffice.org > > > > > > Marcus > > -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org
