--- On Fri, 7/29/11, Norbert Thiebaud <[email protected]> wrote: ... > > > > So let me use a analogy to illustrate why I though that was > a sarcasm: > > to me, Rob's paragraph read as: > > The offer remain open: If any gay person want to marry, we > will gladly recognize that marriage, as long as they marry > someone of the opposite sex. >
Religion is off topic here, but indeed you can't expect that a specific church that defines marriage as the union between a man and a woman to procreate will recognize same sex unions as "marriages". No sarcasm there, just the rules. > > PS: why o why would signing an iCLA be a requirement to be > a project security liaison ? The ICLA covers two things that are essential for any contribution: license and patents. It would be unacceptable to accept security patches that could cause problems in either topic. > it's like asking that any ambassador be naturalized > citizen of the country he is in post in. > Ambassadors only get notified of internal issues; they don't decide. A security officer would be more analogous to a defense minister. Pedro.
