Pavel Janík wrote on Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 19:55:04 +0200: > > On Jul 29, 2011, at 7:49 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > > PS: why o why would signing an iCLA be a requirement to be a project > > security liaison ? it's like asking that any ambassador be naturalized > > citizen of the country he is in post in. > > Because this is how Apache works? >
-1. "Because these are the rules" is an answer suitable for a dictatoracy. The rules aren't arbitrary, there's a logic behind them. For committers an ICLA is required to ensure ASF's and its downstream consumers' rights in contributions. "Would an ICLA be needed for ooo-security@ subscribers" is a different question, and it deserves an answer. > I got that already. And I tend to agree with this. We don't want to be enemy > project in ASF. > -- > Pavel Janík > > >
