Rob Weir wrote:
At Apache, every committer has the ability to veto a change. Not just me. Far from it.
True.
In any case, in order to move the argument forward, I'd like to reiterate thecific concerns that I have, to which I've seen no response other than "we don't want to change". But no one is addressing the fundamental questions: 1) How do we ensure that the future documentation is under the Apache 2.0 license so that it can be copied, modified and redistributed freely by others?
If you talking the wiki, instead of requiring an ICLA as a person has to create an account, why not make it part of that process that "All submitted contributions are under AL2 license". Would that not be sufficient?
2) How do we ensure that the documentation is under PPMC oversight and remains high quality?
I received a daily report of all changes to the wiki, there is also the option for "as done" report. It would only take a few minutes to do a quick review of those changes, an revert them if needed.
I'm open to discussions of various technical and procedural means to achieve these goals. But I am adamant in achieving them one way or another.
Would the above listed work? Andy
