On 16.08.2011 14:32, Rob Weir wrote: > I've uploaded the dump file. There are no abstract, non-specific > risks there. There may be errors. But those would be the kind of > errors that could be described in detail. And they may be the kind of > errors that could be easily fixed. But we won't know until someone > reviews the dump file. > > I could certainly repeat the steps on Linux, but that does not > eliminate risk from misusing hg, svn or any other source of human > error. We'll need to do more than poke a stick at the dump file to > really understand what is in there.
OK, let's be optimistic that besides missing executable bits everything will work fine. > Is anyone planning on actually reviewing the dump file, e.g., loading > it into a local repository, checking it out and looking at the > resulting source tree? Yes, I have planned to do so. I wanted to do it tomorrow (I'm in CEST time zone). Regards, Mathias
