On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Mathias Bauer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16.08.2011 14:32, Rob Weir wrote: > >> I've uploaded the dump file. There are no abstract, non-specific >> risks there. There may be errors. But those would be the kind of >> errors that could be described in detail. And they may be the kind of >> errors that could be easily fixed. But we won't know until someone >> reviews the dump file. >> >> I could certainly repeat the steps on Linux, but that does not >> eliminate risk from misusing hg, svn or any other source of human >> error. We'll need to do more than poke a stick at the dump file to >> really understand what is in there. > > OK, let's be optimistic that besides missing executable bits everything > will work fine. > >> Is anyone planning on actually reviewing the dump file, e.g., loading >> it into a local repository, checking it out and looking at the >> resulting source tree? > Yes, I have planned to do so. I wanted to do it tomorrow (I'm in CEST > time zone). >
Ok. If you are planning on looking at it tomorrow I will redo this conversion from Linux overnight and post a new ooo-dump.gz. If anyone else has suggestions on directory structure or SVN options, etc., please let me know today. > Regards, > Mathias > >
