Off-hand, that is clearly not a permissive license. The substantial-use and non-commercial requirements for a separate license for such use is a show-stopper, it seems to me.
I would imagine the LibreOffice folks need to pay attention to this as well, if they have not done so already. Great catch, Pedro. Thanks. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Pedro F. Giffuni [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 12:26 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [code] stuck at offapi on unxlngx6.pro --- On Mon, 8/29/11, Michael Stahl wrote: ... > > > > With the cleanup of this license headers we can try to > > remove the code in one place and reuse it. > LCC is not copyleft and in our particular use it may be OK, but some provisions could be problematic: https://github.com/drh/lcc/blob/master/CPYRIGHT > any reason why we build our own preprocessors and don't use > the C toolchain preprocessor that is already required to > build OOo? > This is an important question. If we need another preprocessor there are options(1), but we need to now why. cheers, Pedro. (1) http://mcpp.sourceforge.net/
