On Sep 4, 2011 3:45 PM, "Rob Weir" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think discussions about how the project is run is something > that we should be doing in private. Discussing such matters, even if > strong opinions are raised, is the essence of transparency. Remember, > controversial is not the same as confidential. In Apache projects we > discuss non-confidential matters openly. ... unless they are on the PPMC private list, when that royal "we" no longer includes everyone here. I believe Terry and others are saying that the (independent) forum community has a similar approach, with a private forum for sensitive matters. I also believe that in the interests of that very transparency you and others are invited to participate in that place as a transitional activity. What exactly is the problem here? S.
