One lurking question (suppose its also a decision) is content wise is there a plan to transition the content on the current OO.org wiki over to confluence? I'm gathering there are some licensing/community related issues with doing so. But it seems kind of redundant/confusing to have two wikis for one project. I thought OOOUsers would contain similar information to what is now on the OpenOffice.org wiki?
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]>wrote: > [I am *intentionally* breaking this thread off of the building OOo one] > > The OpenOffice.org wiki version reachable on Apache OOo is a test instance > and has not been kept synchronized with the OpenOffice.org "master" as far > as I know. Changes there will be lost when we do a production cut-over. > (We have not staged a cut-over and staging is not defined yet.) It is a > MediaWiki though. > > If you have updates that would work on the OpenOffice.org instance, I > recommend that you make them there. > > If you want to help with the definition and staging of the cut-over, it > might be useful to record your thoughts on OOOUSER in conjunction with Kay > Schenk's matrix at M > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/OOo-to-ASF-site-recommendation > >. > > Finally, at the hands-on level, I believe Terry would welcome more > assistance. > > You wouldn't happen to know how to administer and preserve the OO.o Mailing > List system would you? [Private joke [;<) but I wish it weren't] > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Richards [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 13:49 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Who wants to build OpenOffice? > > Now that I've built OpenOffice on Linux with moderate success, I'd like to > lend a helping hand with the documentation side of things. As far as I am > aware, the existing (maybe old now) wiki has been migrated to Apache Infra > (via VM). Does this content need to be moved to the confluence wikis > eventually? I do apologies if this is off topic, there's been so much > discussion going on proving difficult to follow everything all the way > through. > > -- --Matt
