On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm ... > It looks like I missed where the decision to use MediaWiki and deprecate > confluence > was taken. I guess it was arranged with infra as long as MW is up to date and > the extensions are documented. > > I am not complaining though: it sounds like lazy consensus in action plus we > can > always change mind later on and try the conversion script. >
Do you have a counter-argument? I think the factors are at play were: 1) We have a huge amount of content already in MediaWiki from the legacy project. Although it might be converted to Confluence, the effort would be large. on the other hand 2) MediaWiki was not supported by Apache Infrastructure and getting it supported and migrated would require a lot of admin work So far, it looks like the admin effort has made more progress than the translation effort. Maybe not a final decision, but that is how it looks to me today. -Rob > Pedro.
