On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > Or are you saying that this is a point of a confusion that a > journalist might have who is not familiar with how development works?
It might be a point of confusion for a journalist who titles an article "LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice.org one year later", as if AOO has actually existed for a year. The tone of the article suggests the intended title was "LibreOffice and Whatever Else Might Be Out There, One Year Later". More information put out in more ways might make AOOo less potshot-friendly. Don
