On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: > I find it is interesting that NOTICE is the preference and there are > objections to adding an extension. > > It doesn't let SVN line-ends be dealt with in accord with the local system > though. That is why I use LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in places where I have > a say in the matter. It is also rather universally recognized as text, even > on systems that historically didn't use extensions on file names. (It also > leaves room for .html versions of the same name, for even more excitement.) >
If you use the Apache-recommended Subversion config settings, it will correctly handle the eol-style for NOTICE and LICENSE, even without a file extension: http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt -Rob > Just observing. Not a recommendation. > > - Dennis > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pedro F. Giffuni [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 18:56 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] start collecting the correct content for a > NOTICE.txt file > > Hello juergen; > > I think the file should be named NOTICE (without the .txt extension): > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/ > > Cheers, > > Pedro. > >
