On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: > Regarding the Forum proposal: Assuming the discussion on it stays quiet, it > goes to [VOTE] after midnight UTC tonight. >
Was there going to be a revised proposal that takes into account the comments received? Or was the preference to ignore all the feedback and go to a vote on the original proposal? -Rob > I suggest that a backup and transfer to the pilot version on Apache > infrastructure be done at once, by someone set up to do that, although it is > not possible to bring it up in place of the current service until the dots > are connected. > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 12:18 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Forums down: SQL Error: Too many connections [1040] > > > On Oct 17, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Andrew Rist wrote: > >> That was me - I am able to do some admin tasks on this box. >> I am not able to provide any reasonable response time on issues like this, >> and I am not able to expand access to the env. >> We need to look at transitioning to the Apache hosted Forum and Wiki >> immediately. > > +1. I know that Gavin raised his hand on the Infrastructure side. You raised > your hand on the database dump side. > > Do we have Drew for the WIki? > > Where are "we" with the Forum proposal? > >> Also, we will soon be losing hosting for *.services.openoffice.org >> (I believe the Forum and the Wiki are the last major properties there) > > By soon losing hosting for *.services.openoffice.org what do you mean? Do you > mean days, weeks, or a month? > > Regards, > Dave > >> >> Andrew >> >> On 10/17/2011 11:16 AM, RGB ES wrote: >>> It seems forums are working now >>> >> > >
