On Oct 17, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Regarding the Forum proposal: Assuming the discussion on it stays quiet, it >> goes to [VOTE] after midnight UTC tonight. >> > > Was there going to be a revised proposal that takes into account the > comments received? Or was the preference to ignore all the feedback > and go to a vote on the original proposal?
The proposal was revised. I don't know how the feedback was applied. There is an email about it i the thread. Regards, Dave > > -Rob > >> I suggest that a backup and transfer to the pilot version on Apache >> infrastructure be done at once, by someone set up to do that, although it is >> not possible to bring it up in place of the current service until the dots >> are connected. >> >> - Dennis >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 12:18 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Forums down: SQL Error: Too many connections [1040] >> >> >> On Oct 17, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Andrew Rist wrote: >> >>> That was me - I am able to do some admin tasks on this box. >>> I am not able to provide any reasonable response time on issues like this, >>> and I am not able to expand access to the env. >>> We need to look at transitioning to the Apache hosted Forum and Wiki >>> immediately. >> >> +1. I know that Gavin raised his hand on the Infrastructure side. You raised >> your hand on the database dump side. >> >> Do we have Drew for the WIki? >> >> Where are "we" with the Forum proposal? >> >>> Also, we will soon be losing hosting for *.services.openoffice.org >>> (I believe the Forum and the Wiki are the last major properties there) >> >> By soon losing hosting for *.services.openoffice.org what do you mean? Do >> you mean days, weeks, or a month? >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>> On 10/17/2011 11:16 AM, RGB ES wrote: >>>> It seems forums are working now >>>> >>> >> >>
