On Oct 20, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I think that you and I aren't using "properties" the same way in this > context. I was using it by analogy to the way a real-estate agent or a > rental property manager would use it. I thought I cleared that up. > > Can you explain what you mean without using "property" and being specific to > the Bugzilla Admin topic?
simple answer is attribute or parameter values. Does OOo support for Esperanto include Bugzilla? A User Forum? A Language Pack? A Mailing List? > > I apologize for being so thick about this. I can't visualize what you are > proposing. No worries, I'll explain it more in another thread and in context of the other discussion, but not soon. Today I am focusing my energy on the big issue of which *.services.openoffice.org Oracle is retiring in a week... Regards, Dave > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 13:27 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Bugzilla Admin (was RE: Bugzilla notifications not > going to an ASF mailing list) > > > On Oct 20, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> I don't understand what this means: >> >> "I think we need a languages properties file with items like BZ, Forum, ML, >> Language Pack, etc." > > Just like you stated the need for OOo domain/website/project properties. I > think there is a related need for a language properties collection. > > There are several dimensions to language support in OpenOffice, we need a way > to navigate users to all the support for their language. With a proper > properties file the webpages for each language can include some language > specific navigation. > > Early on there was discussion that Apache websites can identify the incoming > language. It would be good to provide a property that for example could be > used to determine a German user of www.openoffice.org can automatically be > sent to de.openoffice.org (or www.openoffice.org/de/.) > > Regards, > Dave > >> >> - Dennis >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 12:29 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Bugzilla Admin (was RE: Bugzilla notifications not >> going to an ASF mailing list) >> >> >> On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> >>> I believe the next-action on administration of the ooo-bz is ours. It >>> looks like there need to be some @apache.org administrators, and the >>> hierarchy of administration with respect to the various categories also >>> needs to be dealt with. >>> >>> From the list that Mark Thomas provided, I only see 2 apache.org e-mail >>> addresses that have administrative logins, Mark Thomas himself and Herbert >>> Dürr. The rest are openoffice.org addresses of people who may or may not >>> be here, may or may not be committers/PPMC members. They might not have >>> even restored access to their bugzilla account after the move, but I >>> suspect they are still getting automated traffic from ooo-bz!?. >> >> Most of these are here and on the PPMC. >> >> jza, jsc, pjanik, r4zoli, pescetti, ... >> >> But it is a long list. >> >> I think we need a languages properties file with items like BZ, Forum, ML, >> Language Pack, etc. >> >> >>> >>> My thought is that this is an appropriate migration case to handle with >>> more detail on OOOUSER. >> >> Yes. >> >>> >>> I am raising this flag for discussion. I think a couple of admins should >>> be nominated and option 2 taken. The mapping could be explained on the >>> wiki. Who already knows enough ins-and-outs of Bugzilla administration to >>> land running? >> >> Volunteers? Leaders? Let's not all step backwards at once :-) >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> [ ... ] >> >
