On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:07 AM, floris v <[email protected]> wrote: > Op 22-10-2011 6:26, Dennis E. Hamilton schreef: Peter,
> Heck, I also voted +1, 10/18, but apparently also in the wrong list - VOTE > DISCUSS > Sorry about that. > By the way, as the option +0 wasn't included, that vote is invalid, isn't > it? No, it is valid. http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html Reason 1: "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule unless otherwise stated" Reason 2: "+0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.' Therefore you can consider this decision passed and the the forums is very much welcome many people! Congratulations! Cheers Christian
