Op 22-10-2011 9:24, Christian Grobmeier schreef:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:07 AM, floris v<[email protected]> wrote:
Op 22-10-2011 6:26, Dennis E. Hamilton schreef:
Peter,
Heck, I also voted +1, 10/18, but apparently also in the wrong list - VOTE
DISCUSS
Sorry about that.
By the way, as the option +0 wasn't included, that vote is invalid, isn't
it?
No, it is valid.
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Reason 1: "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of
majority rule unless otherwise stated"
Reason 2: "+0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.'
Therefore you can consider this decision passed and the the forums is
very much welcome many people! Congratulations!
Cheers
Christian
I only meant the +0 vote, not the others. In Dutch elections all votes
are invalid that have scribblings on them, even if that'd be something
like "Thank God we have democracy" or more than 1 name ticked. Of
course, such invalid votes don't invalidate the election, they simply
don't count towards the result.
So we have 29 +1 votes, two of them invalid because in the wrong list,
and invalid +0 because that wasn't included in the original set of options.
Cheers,
Peter
